ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2006, 05:11 AM   #31 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrangleHold View Post
Thats not a answer-- MHZ vs. MHZ
A Pentium M 2Ghz would easily outperform an Athlon 64 2Ghz.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 960 (6-6-6-18)
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 08-23-2006, 05:16 AM   #32 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
StrangleHold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: And you think your safe!
Posts: 7,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PC eye View Post
You would need to look over all models and the specifications on each one along with performance reviews in the last several years to make an accurate comparison. The process there would also have to see the same OS, memory, softwares, and things like video and sound for multimedia too. Under ideal circumstances "some" Intel models might have beat an AMD model depending on which models you are comparing. A P3 or P4 to a K5? or Duron maybe?
K6-2+/K6-III+ vs. Pentium II/III

Duron/Sempron vs. Celeron

Athlon/Athlon XP vs. Pentium 4

Athlon X2 vs. Core duo

Show me any Intel that out performed a AMD mached Mhz to Mhz up to the Core 2 Duo
__________________
NZXT Apollo
Athlon 64 X2 5600 3.3ghz.
Gigabyte GA MA770 DS3
G Skill DDR2 1066 944mhz. 4gb.
PNY 8800GT/VD964
W/D RE2 Sata 3.0 500gb.


All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
StrangleHold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 05:17 AM   #33 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
bball4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere....
Posts: 1,423
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
A Pentium M 2Ghz would easily outperform an Athlon 64 2Ghz.
Uh, no.
__________________
Fold To Cure Team 12912

AMD 3700+ San Diego (@2.75) I A8N SLI premium I 1 GB OCZ Gold PC3200 (@460 2-2-2-5) I 160GB Seagate HDD I EVGA 7900GT KO (@550/1800) I Seasonic S12 600W SLI PSU I Audigy 2ZS I MX3100 Mouse/Keyboard I Logitech x5300 I Dell E193FP 19" LCD I Black Aspire X-Cruiser
Macbook I 2.0GHz Yonah I 1GB RAM I 80GB HDD
bball4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 05:18 AM   #34 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
StrangleHold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: And you think your safe!
Posts: 7,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
A Pentium M 2Ghz would easily outperform an Athlon 64 2Ghz.
Not in the same categorie, Even at that you really think a Pentium M 2 Ghz would out do a Athlon 64 3200+, I dont really think so!
__________________
NZXT Apollo
Athlon 64 X2 5600 3.3ghz.
Gigabyte GA MA770 DS3
G Skill DDR2 1066 944mhz. 4gb.
PNY 8800GT/VD964
W/D RE2 Sata 3.0 500gb.


All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.

Last edited by StrangleHold; 08-23-2006 at 05:23 AM.
StrangleHold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 05:50 AM   #35 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bball4life View Post
Uh, no.
There not in the same catagory, seeing as the Pentium M is a mobile processor.

But a Pentium M 2Ghz would outperform an A64 2Ghz by a longshot. The Pentium M is very similar to the Core architecture.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 960 (6-6-6-18)
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 08-23-2006, 05:51 AM   #36 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
PC eye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a pc
Posts: 20,213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrangleHold View Post
K6-2+/K6-III+ vs. Pentium II/III

Duron/Sempron vs. Celeron

Athlon/Athlon XP vs. Pentium 4

Athlon X2 vs. Core duo

Show me any Intel that out performed a AMD mached Mhz to Mhz up to the Core 2 Duo
Don't compare Duron to Celeron. You will lose there unfortunately. But compare the old Slot 1 T-Bird that OCed like crazy and you will have something there to rave about. Intel didn't! !!!
PC eye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 06:00 AM   #37 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
bball4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere....
Posts: 1,423
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
There not in the same catagory, seeing as the Pentium M is a mobile processor.

But a Pentium M 2Ghz would outperform an A64 2Ghz by a longshot. The Pentium M is very similar to the Core architecture.
Actually no, it would definately not be by a long shot. In fact they compared them in this article and the amd athlon 64 with the closest freq. possible beat the pentium m. The pentium m is from the p4 era to so its not really similiar to the core architecture.
__________________
Fold To Cure Team 12912

AMD 3700+ San Diego (@2.75) I A8N SLI premium I 1 GB OCZ Gold PC3200 (@460 2-2-2-5) I 160GB Seagate HDD I EVGA 7900GT KO (@550/1800) I Seasonic S12 600W SLI PSU I Audigy 2ZS I MX3100 Mouse/Keyboard I Logitech x5300 I Dell E193FP 19" LCD I Black Aspire X-Cruiser
Macbook I 2.0GHz Yonah I 1GB RAM I 80GB HDD
bball4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 08:00 AM   #38 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
34erd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 15
Posts: 2,842
Default

Quote:
The pentium m is from the p4 era to so its not really similiar to the core architecture.
The pentium M, core duo, and core 2 duo are all derivatives of the P6 architecture (pentium III), so the architecture is very similar. C2D has some netburst elements in it though.
__________________
DFI Lanparty UT nF4 SLI DR
Athlon 64 3500+ Venice
1 Gig OCZ VX DDR500 DDR
BFG GeForce 7800GT
160 Gig SATA HDD
CD-RW DVD-ROM
Antec NeoPower 480
Thermaltake Tsunami
34erd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 08:11 AM   #39 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
bball4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere....
Posts: 1,423
Default

No the core 2 chip is based on a completely new architecture, the core architecture. The core chips were the last ones based on the netburst architecture.
__________________
Fold To Cure Team 12912

AMD 3700+ San Diego (@2.75) I A8N SLI premium I 1 GB OCZ Gold PC3200 (@460 2-2-2-5) I 160GB Seagate HDD I EVGA 7900GT KO (@550/1800) I Seasonic S12 600W SLI PSU I Audigy 2ZS I MX3100 Mouse/Keyboard I Logitech x5300 I Dell E193FP 19" LCD I Black Aspire X-Cruiser
Macbook I 2.0GHz Yonah I 1GB RAM I 80GB HDD
bball4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 08:21 AM   #40 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
PC eye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a pc
Posts: 20,213
Default

The Core Duo is a different Socket type cpu(478) from the Core 2 Duo(775) as well. The one thing that seems to lack on all but one Intel Core or Core 2 model is hyperthreading. Yet AMD sees that on most of theirs. The only Intel model found so far can be seen at http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819116248
PC eye is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum