|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 21
|
hey, im trying to get all this stuff straight in my head ---
-latency is the time from source to destination for intial connection (like travel time) -bandwidth is the capacity of the connection but one thing i dont get: why does a closer server to me (im in new jersey), such as one in new york, almost always seem to get a much faster connection than one in lets say, china? after the inital connection, shouldnt the flow of data be the same? i was hoping someone could clear this up for me thanks in advance, jut
__________________
-Gigabyte GA-K8N Pro-SLI -Athlon64 3200+ Venice 2.0 ghz -1024 MB Corsair Value RAM -80 GB WD 7200 rpm -160 gb external SimpleDrive -eVGA GeForce 6800XT 256 MB -Logitech Cordless Desktop EX110 -Viewsonic 19" A90f+ -Windows XP Home -HP PSC 2410 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nor Cal
Age: 18
Posts: 6,513
|
The closer the server, the faster the connection. If the server is farther away, then the more wire the data has to go threw. You would only notice a difference once it gets about 1000 miles away though. You got the latency and bandwidth correct btw.
__________________
RIP Mom 9/17/55-02/22/08. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1
|
tadpole alot of people explain bandwidth and speed in terms of running water through a pipe. using this analogy you are correct, after the slight delay due to distance, the download speed should be the same regardless of the physical distance of the host. however the problem is that a connection between you and a source on the internet is actually a very leaky pipe. packets are lost, collisions occur and your computer must rerequest lost packets while recieving the data. the problem is compounded by the fact that these rerequest packets are lost as well and take a significant amount of time to reach the source.
__________________
Case: Ever Case Black Steel ATX Mid Tower Power Supply: Antec SmartPower 2.0 500W Motherboard: eVGA 133-K8-NF41 Socket 939 ATX Processor: AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Venice Memory: G.SKILL 2GB (2 x 1GB) DDR SDRAM DDR 400 Hard Drive: Western Digital Raptor 36.7GB 10,000 RPM Serial ATA150 Video Card: XFX Geforce 7800GT 256MB GDDR3 Monitor: ViewSonic VA1912wb Black 19" 8ms Widescreen LCD Snipers cannot hide :) Last edited by CyrexCore2k; 08-28-2006 at 08:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 88
|
If the server is nearer to you you pass though less networks. There is a better chance that the path is less busy, if you only have to pass though 2 networks then 12. If any network along the way has any speed issues, the whole path is slowed down. You are only as fast as the slowest link.
You can have a high latency network that has high bandwidth, and a low latency network that has low bandwidth. Latency does not neseraly mean that the data transfer will be slow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 21
|
Thanks a lot for the replies --- it makes sense that there are other factors involved, and that helped to clear it up in my head.
__________________
-Gigabyte GA-K8N Pro-SLI -Athlon64 3200+ Venice 2.0 ghz -1024 MB Corsair Value RAM -80 GB WD 7200 rpm -160 gb external SimpleDrive -eVGA GeForce 6800XT 256 MB -Logitech Cordless Desktop EX110 -Viewsonic 19" A90f+ -Windows XP Home -HP PSC 2410 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Increase Your Bandwidth By 20% | Nevakonaza | Internet Discussion | 96 | 12-18-2007 01:52 PM |
| ugh gunz high ping | way2evil | Computer Games and Consoles | 2 | 05-29-2006 12:21 PM |
| Question about Ping | keylogger | Computer Networking and Servers | 1 | 09-24-2005 05:26 AM |
| PING, PLZ can any1 help | ghost | General Computer Chat | 2 | 09-16-2005 01:18 PM |
| A CPU heat Monitoring program | Fire | CPUs and Overclocking | 11 | 12-04-2004 11:13 PM |