ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Internet > Internet Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2006, 10:09 PM   #1 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
kof2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oahu
Age: 27
Posts: 6,273
Default 108mbps wireless

does it only works with 108g routers or it works with 54g and will it run at 108 or 54mbps?
__________________
QX9650@4.2 swiftech |9600@3.0 9700 nt
780i | 790fx
8gb ddr1200 | 8gb ddr1200
2x150gb 3x1tb |2x250gb
3x8800gtx |3x2900xt 1gb
2x20xdvdrw |2x20xdvdrw
15in1 card reader |15in1 card reader
ng15/g9 |ng15/g9
1200w psu |1200w psu
2x28" LCD |2x28" LCD
kof2000 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-28-2006, 10:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 836
Default

Not sure what you mean you havent made it very clear. If you have a 108g router and a 54g adapter then it will only receive at 54. Same as if you have a 54g router and a 108g adpater then it will receive at only 54, as always operates at the slowest value.
__________________
..
tomb08uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2006, 10:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
kof2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oahu
Age: 27
Posts: 6,273
Default

it is backward compatible.
__________________
QX9650@4.2 swiftech |9600@3.0 9700 nt
780i | 790fx
8gb ddr1200 | 8gb ddr1200
2x150gb 3x1tb |2x250gb
3x8800gtx |3x2900xt 1gb
2x20xdvdrw |2x20xdvdrw
15in1 card reader |15in1 card reader
ng15/g9 |ng15/g9
1200w psu |1200w psu
2x28" LCD |2x28" LCD
kof2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2006, 03:58 AM   #4 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,082
Default

The 108Mbps routers use the G standard, however each company has their own way of achieving the 108Mbps rated speed. So yes, you can use any other G device and it will run at 54Mbps, but most likely you would need to purchase identical client cards from the same manufacturer to achieve the rated 108Mbps.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2006, 05:44 AM   #5 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
The 108Mbps routers use the G standard, however each company has their own way of achieving the 108Mbps rated speed. So yes, you can use any other G device and it will run at 54Mbps, but most likely you would need to purchase identical client cards from the same manufacturer to achieve the rated 108Mbps.
Also, though I am not sure if this is true for all brands, you can only get the 108Mbps if all wireless devices on the network are capable of doing so. Should a device that only does 54Mbps come onto the network, then all the other devices would downgrade their speed too. I believe this is what happens with dlink products but not sure about others.
vonbismarck is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-29-2006, 01:15 PM   #6 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,082
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vonbismarck View Post
Also, though I am not sure if this is true for all brands, you can only get the 108Mbps if all wireless devices on the network are capable of doing so. Should a device that only does 54Mbps come onto the network, then all the other devices would downgrade their speed too. I believe this is what happens with dlink products but not sure about others.
Thats very true, with all those types of products.

Manufacturers can achieve 108Mbps with only 802.11g by using multiple channels to output the data. Cards that are from different manufacturers or aren't capable of those speeds, can only use the traditional 54MBps speeds, and will downgrade the network.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2006, 06:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 132
Default

108 Mbps is a feature of wireless adapters and routers based on the Atheros chipset. As long as all the harware uses the Atheros chipset, it should connect at 108 Mbps, though real-world rate will be less than that.
loque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 03:09 AM   #8 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,082
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loque View Post
108 Mbps is a feature of wireless adapters and routers based on the Atheros chipset. As long as all the harware uses the Atheros chipset, it should connect at 108 Mbps, though real-world rate will be less than that.
Nope, different companies use different approaches to reach 108Mbps. Some manufacturers may be compatible, but most likely they won't be.

The only actual standard is the 802.11g, which run at 54Mbps. Anything rated above that is not a standard, and is not guaranteed to work with others.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 09:53 AM   #9 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
Some manufacturers may be compatible, but most likely they won't be.
Which was precisely why I used the term "should."

I'm fully aware it isn't a ratified standard, but thanks for the reminder anyway.
loque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2006, 10:16 AM   #10 (permalink)
Administrator
 
apj101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Age: 26
Posts: 9,169
Default

Quote:
though real-world rate will be less than that.
very very true, and very worth noting, most cards cant reach the 54Mbps let alone 108. we'll need to wait for 802.11n for better universal bandwidth.
Quote:
Which was precisely why I used the term "should."
the word "should" implies that the balance of probability is in favour of the event. In this case that is unlikely and a better word would be "may". Omega was just clearing up a little ambiguity in the statement Anyhow this is just semantics.
__________________
What did one snow man say to the other?
can you smell carrot?

The fight is won or lost far away from witnesses - behind the lines, in the gym, and out there on the road, long before I dance under those lights.

How you do anything, is how you do everything!
apj101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wireless Internet Problem lancer player Computer Networking and Servers 2 04-17-2006 06:03 AM
Wireless Access Points mickz2 Computer Networking and Servers 1 09-01-2005 10:54 AM
Signal and SNR ?? fcuk_jg Computer Networking and Servers 2 07-12-2005 03:40 PM
Wireless for Server 2003 Woz Computer Networking and Servers 2 07-12-2005 01:59 PM
wireless password help steve_00 Computer Networking and Servers 12 01-18-2005 02:08 PM



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum