|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Midlands,Uk
Age: 20
Posts: 8,226
|
Celeron M are in Laptops i think.
__________________
Core 2 Duo E6300 2.8Ghz -Asus Silent Knight II MSI P35 Neo-F (45nm Ready) Seagate Barracuda 250Gb Sata II Western Digital Caviar 400GB Sata II 3Gb GeIL DDR2 @ 800 Mhz (Dual channel) Asus Extreme 8800GT G92 512Mb with Glaciator cooler Creative SoundBlaster X-Fi Xtreme Fidelity 7.1 Sony 20X DVD±RW DL & DVD-RAM SATA Windows Vista Ultimate 64bit SP1|Kaspersky IS 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,219
|
I ask you is why are you getting a celeron? They are some of the worst CPU's. Especialy the D, which DOESNT mean dual core. You can get an AMD for the same price and its better. Even some p4's are cheap, but still better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,313
|
Quote:
__________________
I play Rugby, and no its not like it's sissy cousin with the pads. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 378
|
Yeah I know Celerons are cheap, I am just doing some research.
Okay now im not buying this, its just for an example.. Like you guys say M is in notebooks, then why in this below link are they selling a Celeron D notebook? Notice the speed. http://www.macmall.com/macmall/shop/...592072&Redir=1 If I were to buy a low end notebook why would I opt for a Celeron M @ 1.83GHz when I can get this Celeron D at 2.53Ghz, and if all other components were the same |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,219
|
Oh, woops. My bad.
You would get the M because its made for laptops, as in, it is optimized to use the battery more efficiently and it runs cooler. D's pritty much just suck overall. You should know, you have one. ![]() (Sigh, so do I. )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,082
|
As others have said Celeron M's are mobile, and Celeron D is desktop. M=mobile, D=desktop (not the technical name, but helps to remember it by).
The Celeron M's are much better then the D's, mainly because they are low-end Pentium M's, vs low end Pentium 4's.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in Hell !!!
Posts: 2,600
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Intel Celeron 2.8GHZ Vs. Intel Celeron D 2.8GHZ | jp198780 | CPUs and Overclocking | 20 | 09-30-2007 01:34 AM |
| is the celeron dead? | jimmymac | CPUs and Overclocking | 3 | 10-12-2006 10:54 PM |
| Celeron D or Celeron?? | bugkid | CPUs and Overclocking | 5 | 08-26-2005 01:19 PM |
| General Celeron Questions | SlothX311 | CPUs and Overclocking | 9 | 02-26-2005 05:57 AM |
| Anyone familiar with Intel Celeron D? | Purple Bird | CPUs and Overclocking | 7 | 02-21-2005 05:03 PM |