|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 17
Posts: 640
|
Is there a noticable difference in the speed of DDR2 533 and DDR2 800? Is it worth paying more for the DDR2 800 or not really?
Also if i take the hard drives out of my computer and put them in a totally different comptuer, with a different cpu, motherboard, ram, power supply, will they still work just fine?
__________________
Custom Rig - Still to come: Razer diamondback, sound card, tv tuner, 4gb ram kit, 8800gt, vista & more HDD space
E6400 @ 3.0GHz (1500MHz FSB) | Zalman CNPS 9500 CPU fan Asus P5K Deluxe WiFi-AP edition | (2x1GB) Corsair XMS2 DDR2 800 Evga 8600GT 256MB | Dell E228WFP 22" LCD Western Digital 320GB SATA HDD | Nec 16x DVD Burner | XP Home Thermaltake Armor VA8000BWS | Antec SmartPower 2.0 450watt |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 10,206
|
Yes there is a noticable difference but how much depends on the CPU/memory controller.
The hard drives will still work. If you want to boot off them it's hit and miss with windows.
__________________
You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here. I must plug a couple comics because they are good :D: www.ctrlaltdel-online.com www.userfriendly.org |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a pc
Posts: 19,730
|
Many now are sticking with DDR2 667 rather then jumping at DDR2 800 for ocing where the fsb is lowered. Cromewell touched on both items with cpu and memory controller with the model cpu and what that supports being the most important on a stock machine. To run either memory or cpu with the fsb at the highest setting you need the cpu along with the correct memory both or you are stuck at the lower fsb.
With a large swap out or placed in a totally different build you always have to plan on at least a repair install of XP for the large differences there. The hard drives themselves remain the same unless you are taking an ide drive to run on a strictly Sata board. That's a board with only one not two ide controllers meant for running one or two optical drives. On that type of board sata rules while those with two ide controllers see ide as the default. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 17
Posts: 640
|
Well is the speed difference worth the extra in price? or not really.
__________________
Custom Rig - Still to come: Razer diamondback, sound card, tv tuner, 4gb ram kit, 8800gt, vista & more HDD space
E6400 @ 3.0GHz (1500MHz FSB) | Zalman CNPS 9500 CPU fan Asus P5K Deluxe WiFi-AP edition | (2x1GB) Corsair XMS2 DDR2 800 Evga 8600GT 256MB | Dell E228WFP 22" LCD Western Digital 320GB SATA HDD | Nec 16x DVD Burner | XP Home Thermaltake Armor VA8000BWS | Antec SmartPower 2.0 450watt |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,288
|
It depends. I personally would at least get DDR2 667. Then, if getting DDR2 800 causes you to cut back on other vital components, forget it. Money to spare? Go right ahead with the DDR2 800, especially if you are going to be overclocking.
__________________
Macbook/Intel Core Duo 1.83Ghz/2GB DDR2 667/60GB HD/OSX 10.4.11/160GB 3.5" Firewire External/160GB Maxtor One Touch 4 Mini External/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a pc
Posts: 19,730
|
One classic example of not going with the fastest supported memory was seen on AMD Socket A boards with DDR400 PC3200 memory. Besides the rare and only for prebuilt systems Atholon XP3400+ the XP3200+ was the only other one out of the Atholon XP line of cpus that would run with a fsb of 400mhz. The lower models ran DDR333 or even slower with DDR266 for the XP line. The earlier Atholon models saw either 133 or 166mhz.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|