ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Systems > Desktop Computers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-18-2006, 07:36 PM   #11 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jimmymac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chester, UK
Age: 28
Posts: 3,671
Default

IF you can go for the E6600, it'll be as good (if not a bit better) than and FX-62 so your looking at some serious power there.

I don't think its worth making the jump above the E6600 as the price difference compared with the power difference is huge.

http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applicatio...562&CatId=1969
__________________
I tried to put my signature in here but my pen ruined the monitor.

http://www.peytonmusic.com/
http://forum.peytonmusic.com/

the most uplifting soulful music you will ever hear...
jimmymac is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 12-18-2006, 07:37 PM   #12 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Pck21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny View Post
I would think so caues the average clock rate for a Core 2 is usually 1.8Ghz and D930 is 3.6Ghz thats double the speed. I would also think that the D is better since it is based on the P4 platform opposed to the Core 2 which is based on the Core 2 is based on the same platfor, as the PIII and the M processors I believe.
No no no no. Please do not make the mistake of just looking at the clock speed. If this were the case then EVERYONE would have a pentium D correct? Look at everyone's specs on this board and you'll notice the very opposite. Why? That D930 "claims" to run at "3.6GHz" but it is only running at an fsb of 800Mhz while the e6600 here: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...=CP1-DUO-E6600
runs at an fsb of 1066Mhz. MUCH faster than your D and about $100 less.

You need to trust me on this and everyone on here can back me up. Pentium D's have always claimed to be "faster" than any other chip with just a clock speed. However when they are compared to real processors such as AMD's or the core duo/core 2 duo they can never stack up. They also run extremely hot. I would hate to see you have such an awesome system with that beautiful video card and motherboard and stick an overpriced, overvalued, and under powered chip in that thing. If you like Intel go with a core 2 duo which runs 25% faster than the core duo, consumes less energy, and puts out less heat. If you like AMD, go with the 5200+ chip you suggested. I was like you about a year ago just looking at the clock speed until the nice guys on here showed me the difference. Dig a little further into the real specs of all of your components. The slightest difference in any of them, good or bad, can make your system that much better or under perform that much worse.

To tell you the truth I love the set up you're going with except the chip. The case is beautiful, the motherboards are untouchable, the AMD 5200+ is screamin right now, I like the hard drive for storage wise but if you want an edge in gaming go with the something like western digital raptor X running at 10k rpms and 150GB storage and a second hd like a 350GB for back up and school storage. They'll be the same price as you're 500GB right now only faster and with the SATA setup it'll be a snap. I like the sound card too. Are you getting dolby 5.1 or 6.1? That sound card would be great with a JBL setup or I think Harmon/Kardon has a 5.1 system that would sound sick. Make sure you get a DVD/CD burner and reader as well. Sony's can be expensive but it's your choice. Oh and you may want Windows XP Pro with the upgrade to Vista later on. Pro just seems to run faster.

Anyways I'm jealous of your system. Let me know what you think of the suggestions.
__________________
Current Build--------------------------Laptop
Gigabyte GA-M57SLI-S4 Socket AM2-----------Apple Macbook Pro
AMD Athlon64 X2 5000+ Black Edition Brisbane---------Intel Core 2 Duo
ZALMAN CNPS 9500 heatsink
Western Digital 320GB 7200 Sata and Maxtor 160GB 7200rpm SATA HDD's----------------120GB HDD
OCZ SLI Edition 2GB PC6400 DDR2 Memory--------2 Gigs DDR2 667
EVGA 7600GT------Soon to be EVGA 8800GTS------ATI X1600 Pro 512mb
19'' LCD 8ms Viewsonic monitor-------Laptop Monitor?
Pck21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2006, 08:15 PM   #13 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Age: 18
Posts: 241
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pck21 View Post
No no no no. Please do not make the mistake of just looking at the clock speed. If this were the case then EVERYONE would have a pentium D correct? Look at everyone's specs on this board and you'll notice the very opposite. Why? That D930 "claims" to run at "3.6GHz" but it is only running at an fsb of 800Mhz while the e6600 here: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...=CP1-DUO-E6600
runs at an fsb of 1066Mhz. MUCH faster than your D and about $100 less.

You need to trust me on this and everyone on here can back me up. Pentium D's have always claimed to be "faster" than any other chip with just a clock speed. However when they are compared to real processors such as AMD's or the core duo/core 2 duo they can never stack up. They also run extremely hot. I would hate to see you have such an awesome system with that beautiful video card and motherboard and stick an overpriced, overvalued, and under powered chip in that thing. If you like Intel go with a core 2 duo which runs 25% faster than the core duo, consumes less energy, and puts out less heat. If you like AMD, go with the 5200+ chip you suggested. I was like you about a year ago just looking at the clock speed until the nice guys on here showed me the difference. Dig a little further into the real specs of all of your components. The slightest difference in any of them, good or bad, can make your system that much better or under perform that much worse.

To tell you the truth I love the set up you're going with except the chip. The case is beautiful, the motherboards are untouchable, the AMD 5200+ is screamin right now, I like the hard drive for storage wise but if you want an edge in gaming go with the something like western digital raptor X running at 10k rpms and 150GB storage and a second hd like a 350GB for back up and school storage. They'll be the same price as you're 500GB right now only faster and with the SATA setup it'll be a snap. I like the sound card too. Are you getting dolby 5.1 or 6.1? That sound card would be great with a JBL setup or I think Harmon/Kardon has a 5.1 system that would sound sick. Make sure you get a DVD/CD burner and reader as well. Sony's can be expensive but it's your choice. Oh and you may want Windows XP Pro with the upgrade to Vista later on. Pro just seems to run faster.

Anyways I'm jealous of your system. Let me know what you think of the suggestions.

You see I didn't know that about Pentium D's. Everyone said that they were best which lead me to believe (after using them on other computers) that they were the best processors on Intel's roster. I've always been an AMD fan. My system currently has an AMD and I'm happy with it, it can run programs that require 500 MHz processor fine (cause mine is @ 367Mhz).
The case is gorgeous I fell in love with it the moment I saw it like almost 1 year ago. The sound card says it has a Dolby® Digital EX so I'm not sure if it is 5.1 or 6.1. The video card I love it to tell you the truth I'm a bit dissapointed with it cause I wanted the BFG Nvidea 7900 GTX 1 GB but they dont carry it anymore. The hard drive is incredible, especially in size. Im going to need it what I might do is put another 500gb drive and use that as storage. Im going to need the extra storage because besides school im planning to get into Djing to help pay for my schooling casuse Im going to Ottowa for unversity. So im going to need the extra space for music besides the CAD and graphics that its going to be used for (besides everyday office use). The music reason is also why I choose that sound card. As for the vido card I want something good where I can use not only for watching movies and producing some movies out of graphics but also for gaming sice I wont have enough space to bring in a separate gaming unit. You think I should put in a reader drive as well? Maybe or what I might do is put a second burner since the price is almost the same, cause the Sony drive is only 50.00.
XP Pro is definatley going on that system. I'm currently running Pro on my system and Im happy with it, I wouldnt trade it for Home even for a million dollars. As for Vista I dont think I'll put it anytime soon. I tried the Beta on my friends computer and I wasnt happy with it so I think I'll use Pro until all the bugs are worked out of Vista.
Thanks alot for your suggestions and opions.
johnny is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Computer Flatline? CompyGuy Desktop Computers 3 10-31-2006 04:25 PM
Compaq mother board again exopforce Motherboards 15 09-29-2006 01:05 AM
New Computer Specs Good Or Bad? V_DUBBGTI Desktop Computers 5 01-08-2006 12:36 AM
My new Computer specs :D EternityOfSuffering Desktop Computers 15 08-13-2005 06:16 AM
Getting a new computer, I need your help. fultz Desktop Computers 10 02-17-2005 02:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:43 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum