Motoxrdude

The next time you beat your keyboard in frustration, think of a day when it may be able to sue you for assault. Within 50 years we might even find ourselves standing next to the next generation of vacuum cleaners in the voting booth.
Far from being extracts from the extreme end of science fiction, the idea that we may one day give sentient machines the kind of rights traditionally reserved for humans is raised in a British government-commissioned report which claims to be an extensive look into the future.
Visions of the status of robots around 2056 have emerged from one of 270 forward-looking papers sponsored by Sir David King, the UK government’s chief scientist. The paper covering robots’ rights was written by a UK partnership of Outsights, the management consultancy, and Ipsos Mori, the opinion research organisation.
“If we make conscious robots they would want to have rights and they probably should,” said Henrik Christensen, director of the Centre of Robotics and Intelligent Machines at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
The idea will not surprise science fiction aficionados. It was widely explored by Dr Isaac Asimov, one of the foremost science fiction writers of the 20th century. He wrote of a society where robots were fully integrated and essential in day-to-day life.
In his system, the ‘three laws of robotics’ governed machine life. They decreed that robots could not injure humans, must obey orders and protect their own existence – in that order.
Robots and machines are now classed as inanimate objects without rights or duties but if artificial intelligence becomes ubiquitous, the report argues, there may be calls for humans’ rights to be extended to them.
It is also logical that such rights are meted out with citizens’ duties, including voting, paying tax and compulsory military service.
Mr Christensen said: “Would it be acceptable to kick a robotic dog even though we shouldn’t kick a normal one?
“There will be people who can’t distinguish that so we need to have ethical rules to make sure we as humans interact with robots in an ethical manner so we do not move our boundaries of what is acceptable.”
The Horizon Scan report argues that if ‘correctly managed’, this new world of robots’ rights could lead to increased labour output and greater prosperity.
“If granted full rights, states will be obligated to provide full social benefits to them including income support, housing and possibly robo-healthcare to fix the machines over time,” it says.
But it points out that the process has casualties and the first one may be the environment, especially in the areas of energy and waste.



By Salamander Davoudi in London
Published: December 19 2006 22:01 | Last updated: December 19 2006 22:01

__________________
RIP Mom 9/17/55-02/22/08.

lb562high

ummm..ok

thealmightyone

But until then, we shall continue assaulting our machines.

__________________
E8200 @ 3.576GHz with GA-P35-DS3L
2900 Pro, flashed to XT, oc-ed to 850/1860.
Crucial Ballistix Tracers PC2-8500 2GB
Enermax Modular 620W
Creative Audigy 4
2x Seagate Barracuda 250GB
Jeantech Nitro case, XP Pro and 19" LCD

magicman

I'm sorry, I don't think a robot will be able to sue you for assault by the year 2056. The owner of the robot will, for criminal damage, but we are a long way off the stage of the "positronic brain", of Asimov's theories. A robot, for a long time to come yet imo, will be reliant on what is programmed into him, and that means it has no artificial intelligence in the real sense.

__________________

FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND :F@H Team 44358

nffc10

I Agree

__________________
Amd Athlon 64 X2 6000+ @ 3.31GHz
Asrock AM2NF3 VSTA
2gb Corsair XMS2 PC5400
Sapphire X800XL 256MB AGP
80GB Maxtor Hard Drive
OCZ StealthXtreme 600W PSU

Pictures - 1 2 3

http://www.treasuretrooper.com/438654

Bobo

Yea I saw this a while ago, and I still think it's a bunch of bullcrap. Google for some predictions of now from 50 years ago, and you'll see how insanely out-of-line they are.

fatdragon

lol he is thinking way to the future