ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2007, 10:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
bumblebee_tuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Age: 19
Posts: 1,326
Default nm?

What are 'nm', such as 90nm, 60nm, and 45nm processors? As far as I know, the less nm, the better.....
__________________
Dell Inspiron 1520 Jet Black
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 2.2GHz / 2GB DDR2 667MHz / 160GB 7200RPM
nVidia GeForce 8600m GT 256MB
15.4" WXGA Anti-glare Display (1280x800)
Microsoft Windows Vista Premium w/ Media Direct boot hack into Ubuntu Gutsy

Haikus are easy.
But sometimes they don't make sense.
Refrigerator.

bumblebee_tuna is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-30-2007, 10:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Emperor_nero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 2,313
Default

Nanometers I believe.

EDIT: Heres a wiki about ,meters; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre
__________________
I play Rugby, and no its not like it's sissy cousin with the pads.

Emperor_nero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 10:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
The_Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 17
Posts: 3,300
Default

it is nanometers and yes the smaller the transistor the better. the smaller the transistor the more you fit into a CPU, the more transistor the faster the CPU will be

that is why the C2D beat the X2, the X2 is 90nm (i think) and the C2D is 65nm

they just released news about the new 45nm CPU

45nm CPU's are here
__________________
Rendering Machine
- Gigabyte DS3L P35 -
- C2D E6550 -
- Corsair XMS2 2Gb -
Seagate 'Cuda 320Gb
- Sapphire 2600 XT 256mb -
- Antec Earthwatt 430 watt -
- Antec New Solution Series Case -
- Hp w1907 monitor -
Check Out My Custom Clock Picture 1/\Picture 2
The_Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 11:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,082
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Beast View Post
that is why the C2D beat the X2, the X2 is 90nm (i think) and the C2D is 65nm
You were right in saying with a smaller process, you can fit more on a CPU, but thats not what makes it faster then the X2's. Because if that were the case, the Pentium D's would be better because they are 65nm.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 11:32 PM   #5 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
The_Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 17
Posts: 3,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
You were right in saying with a smaller process, you can fit more on a CPU, but thats not what makes it faster then the X2's. Because if that were the case, the Pentium D's would be better because they are 65nm.

I didn't know that pentium D's where 65nm, thanks


How low do you think they can go nm wise, because right now the silicon is at atomic level, well the new HK transistor will be at that level i think
__________________
Rendering Machine
- Gigabyte DS3L P35 -
- C2D E6550 -
- Corsair XMS2 2Gb -
Seagate 'Cuda 320Gb
- Sapphire 2600 XT 256mb -
- Antec Earthwatt 430 watt -
- Antec New Solution Series Case -
- Hp w1907 monitor -
Check Out My Custom Clock Picture 1/\Picture 2
The_Beast is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-30-2007, 11:52 PM   #6 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
maroon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in Hell !!!
Posts: 2,600
Default

Pentium D 8xx are 90nm

Pentium D 9xx are 65nm
__________________
Free softwares: Avast! antivirus - FireFox - FDM - OpenOffice - CCleaner
maroon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 11:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Cromewell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 10,206
Default

Well the smallest a transistor can physically be is 3 atoms and it's unlikely that that will be feasable in the foreseeable future.
__________________

You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here.

I must plug a couple comics because they are good :D:
www.ctrlaltdel-online.com
www.userfriendly.org
Cromewell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum