|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Age: 19
Posts: 1,326
|
What are 'nm', such as 90nm, 60nm, and 45nm processors? As far as I know, the less nm, the better.....
__________________
Dell Inspiron 1520 Jet Black
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 2.2GHz / 2GB DDR2 667MHz / 160GB 7200RPM nVidia GeForce 8600m GT 256MB 15.4" WXGA Anti-glare Display (1280x800) Microsoft Windows Vista Premium w/ Media Direct boot hack into Ubuntu Gutsy Haikus are easy. But sometimes they don't make sense. Refrigerator. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 17
Posts: 3,300
|
it is nanometers and yes the smaller the transistor the better. the smaller the transistor the more you fit into a CPU, the more transistor the faster the CPU will be
that is why the C2D beat the X2, the X2 is 90nm (i think) and the C2D is 65nm they just released news about the new 45nm CPU 45nm CPU's are here |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,082
|
You were right in saying with a smaller process, you can fit more on a CPU, but thats not what makes it faster then the X2's. Because if that were the case, the Pentium D's would be better because they are 65nm.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 17
Posts: 3,300
|
Quote:
I didn't know that pentium D's where 65nm, thanks How low do you think they can go nm wise, because right now the silicon is at atomic level, well the new HK transistor will be at that level i think |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 10,206
|
Well the smallest a transistor can physically be is 3 atoms and it's unlikely that that will be feasable in the foreseeable future.
__________________
You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here. I must plug a couple comics because they are good :D: www.ctrlaltdel-online.com www.userfriendly.org |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|