View Single Post
Old 08-24-2007, 03:45 PM   #9 (permalink)
maroon1
Diamond Member
 
maroon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in Hell !!!
Posts: 2,820
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ETSA View Post
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphi...=712&chart=318

x1950pro benchmarks far better than the 7900gs
First: It is not "far better"

X1950Pro is just slightly faster, and 7900GS was able to win in three games
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphi...=712&chart=305
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphi...=712&chart=291
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphi...=712&chart=288

Second: X1950Pro at stock is 575/1380, but the one tested in tomshardware is 594/1390 which means that it was overclocked.

It is unfair to compare an overclocked X1950Pro to a stock 7900GS


Quote:
Originally Posted by junwang0808 View Post
ATI card does drain more power than Nvidia card but in X1000 generation. ATI card is faster than Nvidia card.
ATI mid-ranged X1600 series was much slower than Nvidia mid-ranged 7 series

And it seems that 7900GT is faster than X1950Pro
__________________
Free softwares: Avast! antivirus - FireFox - FDM - OpenOffice - CCleaner

Phenom II reviews
maroon1 is offline   Reply With Quote