|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 56
|
I am looking into getting a new CPU. I found a 3.4Ghz with 2x2mb L2 cache, and a manufacturing tech of 65nm. It looks like a decent processor for about 165 bucks. But I was also looking at a Core 2 Duo that is about the same price and the same specs, but it only runs at 1.86 Ghz. Which would be a better choice? I'm wondering if the sacrifice in speed for the Core 2 duo would be worth it or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chester, UK
Age: 28
Posts: 3,692
|
the core 2 duo will be the much faster processor. Dont put too much on the GHZ rating of the processor. The new architecture allows the core 2 duo to eclipse the pentium D for performance
__________________
I tried to put my signature in here but my pen ruined the monitor. http://www.peytonmusic.com/ http://forum.peytonmusic.com/ the most uplifting soulful music you will ever hear... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cairo
Age: 21
Posts: 2,343
|
Totally worth it, it's a totally different architecture Ghz is not everything it's not about how many cycles the CPU can do per second but how many instructions can be fetched per cycle.
go with the core2duo |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,068
|
As the other members have said, the Core 2 Duo would be the best bang for the buck. The Pentium D has a higher clock speed, but it also has a different architecture then the Core 2 Duo.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WA
Age: 24
Posts: 2,224
|
Well if it were to be over clocked it most certainly would beat it out, however, in some benchmarks the higher clocked Pentium d's out perform the e6300.
__________________
DESKTOP Antec P180B(4 x 120mm Tricool fans) Antec 500W neoHE Gigabyte GA 965p DS3 E6400 /w Zalman cnps9500 led 92mm (OC'ed to 3.2Ghz) 4 GB Corsair xms2 DDR2 800 HD4850 512mb ddr3 /w Zalman VF1000 Soundblaster Audigy 4 LAPTOP Core 2 Duo T5750(2.00GHz)/4GB ddr2 667/250GB HD/8600M GT |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
formerly liuliuboy
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 17
Posts: 6,359
|
You can only compared ghz within same lineups of processors. So comparing the clockspeed within C2D's will work, but comparing ghz from P4's and C2D will not. But anyways, the C2D should be superior.
__________________
Silent Tuned | 3D Marks 06: 11566
Q6600 2.4ghz CPU | Gigabyte GA-P35 LGA 775 MB EVGA 8800gt 512mb Video Card G.Skill 4GB Ram | Western Digital 400GB HD X-Fi Xtrememusic Sound Card Antec P180B Case | Scythe Ninja HSF CM Real Power Pro 650watt PSU |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,068
|
Quote:
But when it comes to games, even the lowest Core 2 Duo outperforms the highest Pentium D.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 57
|
core2duo is the best bang for you buck and it overclocks like a champ
__________________
Mobo: Asus P5B-E, Socket LGA 775 CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13Ghz OC'd to 2.7 Ghz, RAM: 2GB DDR2 G Skill, GPU: Nvidia 512MB 7900GS, HDD: Samsung 80GB boot drive, WDC 160GB backup drive, 2 Samsung 400GB in JBOD PSU: Antec 400w Vista Score: 5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in Hell !!!
Posts: 2,583
|
Quote:
Just look at the benchmarks in these websites http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=2795&p=9 http://www.techspot.com/review/8-int...ily/page5.html E6300 performed better than Pentium D 960 3.6GHz on all tests.
In gaming E6300 performs better than Pentium Extreme edition 965 3.73GHz |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Intel core 2 Extreme vs Duo vs Quad | nameIess | CPUs and Overclocking | 11 | 07-09-2007 07:27 AM |
| Pentium D Vs Core 2 Duo. | Schonza | CPUs and Overclocking | 2 | 01-30-2007 02:28 AM |
| difference between Intel Core 2 Duo and Pentium D Dual CORE | pope | Desktop Computers | 3 | 09-06-2006 03:32 AM |
| Core 2 vs Core Duo | roy_rajat | CPUs and Overclocking | 7 | 08-31-2006 11:11 AM |
| M-755 vs Core Duo T2300 | eg5022 | Laptop and Handheld Computers | 3 | 02-22-2006 04:47 PM |