|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,069
|
Im sure within a year 4GB will start becoming too low for high-end gamers, and they would then need to buy a 64-Bit OS.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179 |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WA
Age: 24
Posts: 2,225
|
64 bit OS are arguably 'faster' or better. To be honest I have never noticed a difference. One good thing about 32 bit is they have fewer compatibility issues and tend to play better with most software, considering 64 bit really isn't the standard. Well at least not the most popular.
I also highly doubt 4 gigs of RAM will become the standard for high performance gaming machines, especially with how fast RAM is getting. DDR3 will be out this year for use in system memory. So that argument is kind of moot.
__________________
DESKTOP Antec P180B(4 x 120mm Tricool fans) Antec 500W neoHE Gigabyte GA 965p DS3 E6400 /w Zalman cnps9500 led 92mm (OC'ed to 3.2Ghz) 4 GB Corsair xms2 DDR2 800 HD4850 512mb ddr3 /w Zalman VF1000 Soundblaster Audigy 4 LAPTOP Core 2 Duo T5750(2.00GHz)/4GB ddr2 667/250GB HD/8600M GT |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 6,086
|
Again, I don't think so, that would flood the market. Game developers want to market games to people with existing technology, not force people to upgrade. I would say it will be three years before 64bit OSes are required. Hell, lots of games still support windows 98!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,069
|
Quote:
All of the new games that look promising are said to only work with DX10 and Vista, and even having dual 8800's would bottleneck them!
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 6,086
|
Again, we will have to agree to disagree. I think MS will flop on the DX10 thing and eventually release it for XP. I also think that if a developer was wise they would want to keep in legacy support for casual gamers. You figure if a video game sells 10 million copies, only a small percentage of those 10 million are hardcore gamers that will play all the time with the latest and greatest hardware. When people get forced to upgrade who are casual (which is a subjective term I suppose) a lot of times they will just wait until its cheaper or whatever. Vista did not get that great of sales, and especially not the amount of sales they anticipated. In fact most businesses and educational organizations will not roll out vista for another year probably or more.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| buying a new laptop... Vista vs. RAM and compatibility | Mie | Operating Systems | 7 | 04-26-2007 11:27 AM |
| Buying Vista overseas? | WellingMan | Operating Systems | 3 | 01-31-2007 10:15 PM |
| Buying video card for DX10 vista? | Niskyspy | Video Cards and Monitors | 19 | 12-08-2006 10:55 PM |
| OS Buying Questions (Thinking about Vista) | ezefosure | Operating Systems | 11 | 09-01-2006 01:08 AM |