View Single Post
Old 12-17-2007, 06:34 PM   #16 (permalink)
Motoxrdude
Diamond Member
 
Motoxrdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nor Cal
Age: 17
Posts: 5,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ride3k View Post
wow your a big pile of smart huh?

a 2.4ghz Quad core with a 1000mhz FSB WILL never beat a 3.0 ghz dual core with a 1333mhz FSB in anything BESIDES multi threaded apps. I can think of so few software that utilizes more than 2 cores and even less that I personally would use, thus making the greater processing power of the e6850, more keen to what I would use it for. Just b/c you think buying a 6 month old processor make you think your future proof dose not mean it is true. MAYBE when intel releases their 45nm FASTER and HIGHER FSB quadcores in the end of January, it would be more wise to go quadcore as a future proof, but we are talking about RIGHT NOW
Ever notice how process intensive apps are almost always multi threaded? What would you need a fast processor for? Video editing, rendering, compiling, cad? Well guess what?! All the quality video editing, rendering, cad, and compilers utilize quad core. That and for $40 more you can upgrade from the e6600 dual core to the quad core version. I still don't know why you are such a fan boy of dual core.
__________________
RIP Mom 9/17/55-02/22/08.
Motoxrdude is offline   Reply With Quote