ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2007, 01:45 AM   #1 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: portland, oregon
Age: 18
Posts: 1,126
Default Are Core 2 Duo's better even without overclocking?

I'm looking into buying/building a new computer. I'm kind of a noob with regards to computer hardware, so I'd rather not overclock. With that in mind, are Core 2 Duo's still better than AMD's? Even if they have lower clockspeeds? For example, the AMD 64X2 5400 is about equivalent to the Intel core 2 6600, but the AMD is 2.8GHz, the Intel is 2.13. Even at these speeds, are the Intels still better? What percentage better are the Intels?
oregon is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 06-25-2007, 01:59 AM   #2 (permalink)
banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,060
Default

Do you mean E6420? AMD is trying Intel's old tricks, jacking up the advertised speed. The Intel is probably better and more future proof, the Intel has twice the cache with the E6400 and 4 time the cache with the E6420.
INTELCRAZY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 02:49 AM   #3 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
PC eye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a pc
Posts: 20,474
Default

The AMD64 6000+ X2 3ghz model now on order will probably end up ringing circles around the Core 2 E6600 at 2.13ghz without problem while generally the Core2 Duos are getting better reviews for gaming. But don't think for a moment that AMD won't make a comeback to regain their performance edge at some point. The two companies are always trying to outperform the other.

In fact in a recent hour of the weekly CBS series 60 MINUTES the segment on "What If Every Child Had A Laptop?" brought out a critism of Intel trying to "dump" laptops for below cost when a non profit group was started to provide laptops for kids where there are no schools in poor countries. The laptops just happen to use AMD cpus. The brief and video clip on this can be seen at http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/...n2830058.shtml
__________________
What The Data Miners Are Digging Up About You
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Tec...6355541&page=1

High Tech gifts for the Holidays under $150
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/GadgetGuide/
PC eye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 02:54 AM   #4 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
kof2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oahu
Age: 27
Posts: 6,273
Default

if you dont overclock then amd is the way to go. they have 3ghz at reasonable price.
__________________
QX9650@4.2 swiftech |9600@3.0 9700 nt
780i | 790fx
8gb ddr1200 | 8gb ddr1200
2x150gb 3x1tb |2x250gb
3x8800gtx |3x2900xt 1gb
2x20xdvdrw |2x20xdvdrw
15in1 card reader |15in1 card reader
ng15/g9 |ng15/g9
1200w psu |1200w psu
2x28" LCD |2x28" LCD
kof2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 03:34 AM   #5 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
PC eye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a pc
Posts: 20,474
Default

Here I was looking at both dual and quad core models that run upto 3ghz when going to replace the 2.22ghz single core model in use for a new work horse build. For an AMD quad core model the board cost as much as the cpu plus being a twin cpu model not a one cpu type board. A server board with SLI doesn't make it here. The double leap in stock speed and having a second core for multitasking would be the gain here. With the gap between the two models mentioned being that large in stock speed the AMD does stand out even for gaming.
__________________
What The Data Miners Are Digging Up About You
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Tec...6355541&page=1

High Tech gifts for the Holidays under $150
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/GadgetGuide/
PC eye is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 06-25-2007, 07:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: portland, oregon
Age: 18
Posts: 1,126
Default

Thanks for all the responses guys. I think I'll go with an AMD afterall.
oregon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 07:45 PM   #7 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,447
Default

The AMD X2's are decent for the price, and both perform roughly the same at stock speeds. But you also have to consider the prices and options for motherboards, and other accessories, when comparing AMD and Intel.

http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.ht...=433&chart=165
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.ht...=433&chart=168
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.ht...=433&chart=167
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 960 (6-6-6-18)
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 08:12 PM   #8 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
maroon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in Hell !!!
Posts: 2,641
Default

Quote:
AMD 64X2 5400 is about equivalent to the Intel core 2 6600,
Thats incorrect.

At stock E6600 performs as good or even better than 6000+
__________________
Free softwares: Avast! antivirus - FireFox - FDM - OpenOffice - CCleaner
maroon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2007, 02:56 AM   #9 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
PC eye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Inside a pc
Posts: 20,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maroon1 View Post
Thats incorrect.

At stock E6600 performs as good or even better than 6000+
Don't count on it. It takes more then the cpu alone to make a good performance build.
__________________
What The Data Miners Are Digging Up About You
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Tec...6355541&page=1

High Tech gifts for the Holidays under $150
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/GadgetGuide/
PC eye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2007, 05:09 AM   #10 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PC eye View Post
Don't count on it. It takes more then the cpu alone to make a good performance build.
Maroon is right, the E6400 is on par with the X2 5600+ in terms of CPU performance.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 960 (6-6-6-18)
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Quad core and and Octa-core (8 CPUs) will be released soon maroon1 CPUs and Overclocking 29 10-30-2006 06:12 PM
Overclocking a duel core Hawk16 CPUs and Overclocking 1 11-05-2005 05:27 PM
overclocking for first time, ASUS tnt27 CPUs and Overclocking 19 07-10-2005 01:54 PM
Overclocking?? joelkyr CPUs and Overclocking 5 08-23-2004 09:44 PM
memory overclocking guide pt 1 Rick G CPUs and Overclocking 4 07-08-2004 03:46 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum