|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, MA
Age: 16
Posts: 183
|
pentium 4 without a doubt. Celerons are pretty bad
__________________
DESKTOP MOBO: EVGA 790i ULTRA SLI CPU: Intel Core 2 QUAD Q6600 OC'ed 3.0ghz RAM: 2GB OCZ Reaper 1333mhz DDR3 GPU: EVGA GTX280 CASE: Antec P182 HDD: Western Digital VelociRaptor 300gb 10k COOLING: Xigmatek HDT-S1283 with retention brace |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 26,897
|
The Pentium 4 is far better, but even the P4's are outdated. If your looking to buy a new laptop, you can find some cheap ones on eBay with Pentium M's, although Core (2) Duo's would be the best.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo T9300 2.5GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM965 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // Dual 512MB GDDR3 8600M GT's SLI 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 3GB DDR2 667 DC 750GB SATA 3.0Gbps w/32MB // 400GB (2x 200GB) 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21366 // 7394 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 13
Posts: 10,012
|
+1 for P4. But I would do as OMEGA says and get an M or C2D.
__________________
Core 2 Duo E2140 1.6GHz @ 3.04GHz GA-P31-DS3L pqi Turbo CL4 DDR2-800 2GB Sapphire HD3850 256MB Sony Writemaster DVD Burner EIDE Seagate Barracuda 80GB 7200.9 8MB SATII |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in Hell !!!
Posts: 2,577
|
It depends on which celeron you are talking about......
Some of celeron's are based on Pentium M or Core architecture, and those can easily beat Pentium 4 at the same clock speed. However, Celeron's based on NetBurst architecture would perform much slower than Pentium 4 at the same clock speed |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 26,897
|
Quote:
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo T9300 2.5GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM965 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // Dual 512MB GDDR3 8600M GT's SLI 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 3GB DDR2 667 DC 750GB SATA 3.0Gbps w/32MB // 400GB (2x 200GB) 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21366 // 7394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
I am actually refering to a pentium 4 mobile processor vs an intel celeron mobile processor. So from all the response gathered on top, so it means that a pentium 4 mobile is actually slower than a celeron mobile right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, MA
Age: 16
Posts: 183
|
yea pentium 4 is still faster.
__________________
DESKTOP MOBO: EVGA 790i ULTRA SLI CPU: Intel Core 2 QUAD Q6600 OC'ed 3.0ghz RAM: 2GB OCZ Reaper 1333mhz DDR3 GPU: EVGA GTX280 CASE: Antec P182 HDD: Western Digital VelociRaptor 300gb 10k COOLING: Xigmatek HDT-S1283 with retention brace |
|
|
|