Quote:
Originally Posted by dgast06
Let me see if i can settle this. Blow for blow, intel beats the crap out of amd. Hello, 45nm quads mean anything to you? But lets look at the price /performance ration. Intel has run into the same thing as any other big product. Your paying a crap-ton of money for the name. If i had 5 thousand to spend on a new rig, i would go Intel, but as it was, i had 2000 so i went AMD. My old rig(not in my sig) ran a 2.6 dual core and never even had a problem. keep in mind i spent 140$ on it. Where i come from, we call that a good deal.
|
i agree. For intel, your paying mainly for the name, as quality goes.. im not sure.
AMD is cheaper, and thats a fact, but is it going to break or is it as slow as crap?.
AMD has a 3.2 GHz for 150$
Intel is expensive. Intel has a 3.0 GHz for 270$
see the difference? NOW, Amd and intel dont run on the same clocking speed.
for Intel.... If you buy intel, are you paying for quality or for the name?
for AMD.... If you buy AMD, are you paying for quality or is AMD better and faster then intel and they just have lower prices?
can anyone answer these questions?