Thread: q9300 vs q6700
View Single Post
Old 05-10-2008, 12:31 PM   #25 (permalink)
hackapelite
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Solicitor's office
Posts: 955
Default

If q9300 costs the same as q6700, I would go for it (q9300) since they're 45nm and run cooler allowing more room for OCing, and even if you don't plan on doing any OCing the architecture is improved, meaning it's more efficient, AFAIK efficient enough to make up for the smaller cache.
__________________
BY READING THE ABOVE POST, YOU AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING:

"The above post is provided solely for entertainment purposes and is not to be taken as professional advice. Therefore, I shall not be held responsible for any damage or losses that are result from anything I have posted, to the extent applicable by law. In the unlikely event that I CAN be held responsible, I have never been here, I am not here, and I will never be here, and it will be highly questionable whether I even exist."
hackapelite is offline   Reply With Quote