XP or Vista

XP or Vista

  • Windows XP

    Votes: 47 58.8%
  • Windows Vista

    Votes: 33 41.3%

  • Total voters
    80
Status
Not open for further replies.
try for over a year, since RC 1. I don't boot it very often but maybe once a week or so I boot into it and mess with it. Been running Vista Business since release in January 2007, so been using it for about 11 months now.


i didn't ever hear the specs on that system :p
 
i didn't ever hear the specs on that system :p

Which one?

Macbook Pro, C2D 2.18, 2gigs of RAM, radeon x1600

HP Buisness class desktop (dx 5150 i think)
AMD 64 3500, 3gigs of RAM, Radeon x800

iMac C2D 2.16 , 2gigs of RAM, radeon x1600

custom built C2D e6300, 2gigs of RAM, radeon x1600 (i think the video card could be different in that model).

Gateway 450 ROG laptop (not very good specs for vista)

HP NC4200 laptop w/ 2 gigs of RAM (google the specs)

and like 3 other HP business class desktops, dx5150, dc5000, and I can't remember all the models. All were P4 3.0 w/ at least 2 gigs of RAM or better.
 
Which one?

Macbook Pro, C2D 2.18, 2gigs of RAM, radeon x1600

HP Buisness class desktop (dx 5150 i think)
AMD 64 3500, 3gigs of RAM, Radeon x800

iMac C2D 2.16 , 2gigs of RAM, radeon x1600

custom built C2D e6300, 2gigs of RAM, radeon x1600 (i think the video card could be different in that model).

Gateway 450 ROG laptop (not very good specs for vista)

HP NC4200 laptop w/ 2 gigs of RAM (google the specs)

and like 3 other HP business class desktops, dx5150, dc5000, and I can't remember all the models. All were P4 3.0 w/ at least 2 gigs of RAM or better.

I think hes sayin the one with vista on it is wat he didn't here the specs on
 
So.. you tried vista on all those computers?

i'm just messing with ya, we all know you don't like vista for whatever reason it may be/or whatever you were doing wrong.. ok i'll stop :p

you should respect everyones opinions here... or atleast bite your tongue and try to

*cough*vista is better*cough*
 
try for over a year, since RC 1. I don't boot it very often but maybe once a week or so I boot into it and mess with it. Been running Vista Business since release in January 2007, so been using it for about 11 months now.

You weren't the only one going for RC1 last year. I didn't bother looking at RC2 since that was still another beta. I never did get stuck by rushing into ME and waited for SP1 for XP to come out before dual booting it with 98SE.

For Vista I decided not to wait for SP1 since I knew that would take a good year or so with Q1 2008 supposedly seeing that. First it was supposed to be this month which sounded premature anyways since it took a full year for XP's SP1 there.
 
Yes, I have had vista on at least a dozen machines since RC 1. Of course you are entitled to your own opinion, but at least I explain why I think a certain way and just don't say its better because I say so.

Like I said beforehand many times, vista is just a disappointment. I really wanted EFI hardware support in windows, and they dumped it because MS probably has horrible project management is what I am guessing.

You can agree or disagree or agree to disagree, I don't care and I am not calling anyone out. Just speaking from my personal experience
 
With any version it mainly depends on what you are looking for in it. I was never "thrilled" about the "eye candy" MS is using to sell the new version like many were there. My reason was to see if it was going to be suitable for the type of system and applications run here.

I originally paid $200 retail for 98SE those years back so spending $119.99 for the OEM for system builders edition was lower priced option there just to see how this one shapes up. Vista certainly runs better on the newer hardwares out since XP is not seeing the adequate driver support it should.
 
Yes, I have had vista on at least a dozen machines since RC 1. Of course you are entitled to your own opinion, but at least I explain why I think a certain way and just don't say its better because I say so.

Like I said beforehand many times, vista is just a disappointment. I really wanted EFI hardware support in windows, and they dumped it because MS probably has horrible project management is what I am guessing.

You can agree or disagree or agree to disagree, I don't care and I am not calling anyone out. Just speaking from my personal experience

What is EFI? Electronic Fuel Injection?
 
i have a copy of vista here, and i installed it twice and twice i have wiped and put XP back on, its jus more compatible with most things, vista is just pretty colours they spent too much time on bodywork rather than the engine, XP will always be better and the more popular OS, WHY? because its more stable ALOT FASTER and ALOT less blue screens
 
i have a copy of vista here, and i installed it twice and twice i have wiped and put XP back on, its jus more compatible with most things, vista is just pretty colours they spent too much time on bodywork rather than the engine, XP will always be better and the more popular OS, WHY? because its more stable ALOT FASTER and ALOT less blue screens

always be a better and more popular os lmao I disagree
 
XP was a sore loser just a few years back when people didn't want to leave 98SE or 2000 behind! XP more stable? HAR! Despite drivers for some newer hardwares Vista does offer better crash control for games and apps then XP ever will while lacking sadly in some other areas.
 
What is EFI? Electronic Fuel Injection?

Extensible Firmware Interface. It means that firmware can be gigs in size, run its own 32bit or 64bit applications. Basically, it makes drivers obsolete. All the software you will need to run the hardware will be stored in firmware and talk to the other hardware through EFI. It is actually a very cool technology. The BIOS is old and busted technology and it is like over 20 years old. It is time they ditch that and go with EFI.

Google it or wikipedia it.
 
I am currently using win xp home on my pc with a p4 cpu, 1gb ram and 64mb graphics. I am thinking of getting a new rig with a dual core, 2gb ram and 256mb graphics. I was thinking if it would a waste if I am to buy a second copy of windows xp home.
Any suggestions?
 
yes i suggest windows vista. as noted by pc-eye, it is more stable then XP... i have a system with xp and a system with vista running right next to eachother, and the vista one is cleaner and runs very crisply, at the expense of a paltry 150MB increase in ram useage
 
yes i suggest windows vista. as noted by pc-eye, it is more stable then XP... i have a system with xp and a system with vista running right next to eachother, and the vista one is cleaner and runs very crisply, at the expense of a paltry 150MB increase in ram useage

How is it more stable? Why have so many companies allowed users to downgrade to windows XP if it was so much more stable? You never see that. You didn't see downgrade options for XP, 2k, or even ME.

My XP machine at boot has like maybe 250megs of RAM being used when idle, my vista install on the same machine would have over 700megs of used memory idle. how is that more efficient? It is the band-aid approach.
 
The only reason I voted for XP now is because of compatibilty and support issues. The performance is not an issue for me because my system is robust enough to run either one. Maybe later if they get all the bugs worked out I will vote for Vista. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top