BurningSkyline
New Member
The person on the top was saying "yes you are a fanboy, considering how bad AMD is compared to intel and nvidia."
Also, I apologize for the overly large photo.
Would you consider this person to be a fanboy, at all?
- Thread starter BurningSkyline
- Start date
The person on the top was saying "yes you are a fanboy, considering how bad AMD is compared to intel and nvidia."
Also, I apologize for the overly large photo.
DMGrier
VIP Member
Maybe, there is nothing wrong with liking a product, disagree with AMD barley being able to run Minecraft cause those quad cores and six core cpu's they are pretty nice for the price.
But proof of a non fan boy is being able to admit when a product is better then your like we all know current AMD cpu's do not have anything on current Intel cpu's. So does he deny that Intel is better then AMD?
But proof of a non fan boy is being able to admit when a product is better then your like we all know current AMD cpu's do not have anything on current Intel cpu's. So does he deny that Intel is better then AMD?
BurningSkyline
New Member
I actually didn't want to post this thread in the first place, but yes he did. If it isn't Nvidia or Intel, its a downgrade.
EDIT: If you see the name Slixor I can pretty much guarantee its that person talking there... He is damn well near cyber stalking the people on our minecraft server because we banned him.
Last edited:
claptonman
New Member
Yes, intel does make superior products. But saying that an AMD CPU will barely run windows is ridiculous. AMD makes perfectly good products. That being said, I have been Intel all this time, but the bulldozer is on my radar for my new build.
wolfeking
banned
I wasnt arguing that intel isnt better. I know it is. My i3-380m will blow away my Phenom II x4 laptop processor any day you ask it to. What I was saying is, it seems from what he is saying in that screen shot is that all intels are better than all AMD's. This is not true. Take a Pentium 3 vs a Sempron 130. whats going to be a faster processor? or a Pentium 4 vs a Phenom II x 4 955. His argument there isnt holding water.
claptonman
New Member
I wasn't really replying to your post specifically, but yeah, agreed.
Twist86
Active Member
Guy is a fanboy, AMD rigs are just fine especially for budget users and the Phenom II line has shown to be a great overclocker. Intel will provide better results especially when you overclock but you pay more of a premium for what you get.
I always thought the AMD vs Intel vs Nvidia vs ATI was stupid. Each has their own appeal and personally I want neither side to be superior for more than a year or two at a time. Prevents one from destroying the other and helps keep prices down and the tech come out faster.
Intel has shown they will "sit" on chips with no competition around, I imagine AMD would too if they ever had Intel's monopoly years ago.
I always thought the AMD vs Intel vs Nvidia vs ATI was stupid. Each has their own appeal and personally I want neither side to be superior for more than a year or two at a time. Prevents one from destroying the other and helps keep prices down and the tech come out faster.
Intel has shown they will "sit" on chips with no competition around, I imagine AMD would too if they ever had Intel's monopoly years ago.
Indeed. You're absolutely right.