|Official| Smiles Benchmark 2.0 Ranking Thread! (new version :P)

StrangleHold said:

The 4 threaded one is still screwed up for AMD. It was using 6 cores, one around 80% and the other 5 around 50%.

The 8 threaded one ran fine. Pegged all 8 cores to 100%. Got 21.8 running at 4.2ghz.

This is with a 8120 running 4.2ghz.

Click to expand...

Yeah, mine were all over the place, too. (for the 4-threaded test)

SmileMan said:

you forgot to test the 8threaded benchmark, I thought you got 27 sec? Thats close to that amd's.
The top 8threaded is also with johnb35 on the first place

Click to expand...

Yeah sorry I wrote those scores late at night and I was dropping off to sleep. I got 27.6 seconds for the 8-threaded by the way.

Have a nice vacation!

claptonman said:

Yeah... not to say its a bad benchmark, but it seems like it jumps around all the time. Might have something to do with temps, but each time I ran it, I closed everything else and relogged in. I dunno.

Click to expand...

Mine sometimes jumps around a bit too. Not sure if there's a lot we can do to sort this out.

StrangleHold said:

The 4 threaded one is still screwed up for AMD. It was using 6 cores, one around 80% and the other 5 around 50%.

The 8 threaded one ran fine. Pegged all 8 cores to 100%. Got 21.8 running at 4.2ghz.

This is with a 8120 running 4.2ghz.

Click to expand...

Might be worth for the time being just comparing the Intels and AMDs by using the 8-threaded bench only then if the heavy benchmark is still playing up on AMDs. The 8-threaded benchmark seems fine for the AMD chips at the moment.

I'll run it once I build my computer. For now my laptop has only 32-bit.

Why do you think the 4threaded is that bad? I see only scores from the same cpu in the same region, like most are here 145-165. The intel 2 quad from vistakid had 199seconds!
So I think amd's are doing great now. I saw your pictures, they are telling me that your cpu divides the work from one core to the other. Thats what yhey do all the time, with everything.
I'll fix that when I come back (I really don't know whats the problem)


vista, could you add these? Don't have the time...


all of it is in stockspeed
here's my short one:




and long one: (not much better then all that amd's)



smile

StrangleHold said:

The 4 threaded one is still screwed up for AMD. It was using 6 cores, one around 80% and the other 5 around 50%.

The 8 threaded one ran fine. Pegged all 8 cores to 100%. Got 21.8 running at 4.2ghz.

This is with a 8120 running 4.2ghz.

Click to expand...

Because they divide it...
You must run another benchmark or game. You'll see the same.
Quaads will have 90-100% load on the 4threaded bench.

Utilized all cores on my machine, not sure what people were complaining about but that does seem to be ok right now.


Heavy Run

Light Run

SmileMan said:

Why do you think the 4threaded is that bad? I see only scores from the same cpu in the same region, like most are here 145-165. The intel 2 quad from vistakid had 199seconds!
So I think amd's are doing great now. I saw your pictures, they are telling me that your cpu divides the work from one core to the other. Thats what yhey do all the time, with everything.
I'll fix that when I come back (I really don't know whats the problem)

Click to expand...

We'll wait for a few more AMD benches and see. I think they're OK too, just some people are saying it's still not working correctly. :/ Fury's scores above for his Phenom seem absolutely fine to me.

I've not run the newest benchmark on the Core 2 Quad yet. I'll run it tonight and tell you how I did. I got 206 on the older one (see a few pages back).

SmileMan said:

vista, could you add these? Don't have the time...


all of it is in stockspeed
here's my short one:

<cut>


and long one: (not much better then all that amd's)
<cut>


smile

Click to expand...

I've gotta go to school now (running a bit late), but I will update the leaderboard with all the new scores when I get back from school in about 7-8 hours time.

Lol, wifi on the airplane!!

Id like to see milder OC and stock runs myself, the high overclocks may be making the bench unstable in its early stages, thats my thoughts on it.

Somebody put up a shot of task manager showing the cores running the 4 threaded one using a Intel quad with HT.

Just downloaded and ran the latest benchmark on my Q8300 so we can see how an older quad-core performs.

Heavy benchmark (running 100% on all 4 cores):




Light benchmark (running 100% of all 4 cores)

Weird. On a AMD 6/8 core its using 6 cores and it jumps around between 30/80% core useage. This is running the 4 threaded one. Would like to see a Intel 6 or 4 core with HT if its the same.

Stock clock, heavy 4 then soft 8.
i7 3770s @3.1

I'll have the new leaderboard up in a bit.

Current Scores!

*Times are in seconds. Lower is better!

*All CPU clockspeeds are stock unless otherwise stated.

Top 15 4-Threaded

1. Laquer Head - i7 3770K 5.2 - 16G RipJaws-X 1600 - 89.2945568
2. vistakid10 - i5 2500K 4.3 - 16G RipJaws-X 1648 - 98.4861003
3. SmileMan - i7 2600K - 16G Hyper-X 1600 - 111.4573749
4. jimkonow - i7 3770S - 16G RipJaws-X - 120.9002124
5. Laquer Head - i7 3610QM - 16G Vengeance 1866 - 129.368
6. Hyper-Threaded - X4 855 - 4G RipJaws-X 1333 - 154.7522698
7. FuryRosewood - X4 955 - 16G Crucial 1333 - 156.2702156
8. johnb35 - X4 965 - 8G Vengeance 1600 - 165.6566888
9. Claptonman - FX-6100 4.3 - 8G RipJaws-X 1600 - 166.0312869
10. vistakid10 - Q8300 - 4G DDR2 667 - 171.42


Top 15 8-Threaded

1. Laquer Head - i7 3770K 5.2 - 16G RipJaws-X 1600 - 16.7232294
2. jimkonow - i7 3770S - 16G RipJaws-X - 18.153434
3. SmileMan - i7 2600K - 16G Hyper-X 1600 - 18.8240766
4. Laquer Head - i7 3610QM - 16G Vengeance 1866 - 20.5764361
5. Claptonman - FX-6100 4.3 - 8G RipJaws-X 1600 - 21.4390775
6. vistakid10 - i5 2500K 4.3 - 16G RipJaws-X 1648 - 27.6008391
7. jonnyp11 - X4 960T 3.8 - 8G Kingston 1333 - 28.297828
8. Hyper-Threaded - X4 855 - 4G RipJaws-X 1333 - 30.1080525
9. FuryRosewood - X4 955 - 16G Crucial 1333 - 34.6200479
10. johnb35 - X4 965 - 8G Vengeance 1600 - 34.8505607
11. vistakid10 - Q8300 - 4G DDR2 667 - 48.701

Remember if your CPU and/or RAM is overclocked to say so in your post or write it in your signature!

2. jonnyp11 - X4 960T 3.8 - 8G Kingston 1333 - 103.8160757

Click to expand...

That is from the first benchmark, not the revised one with the light- heavy option.

Hyper-Threaded said:

That is from the first benchmark, not the revised one with the light- heavy option.

Click to expand...

Thanks, edited the leader board.

Installing XPx64 on my old Athlon 64 3700+ box now. I want to see how badly an 8 year old chip does.

vistakid10 said:

Thanks, edited the leader board.

Installing XPx64 on my old Athlon 64 3700+ box now. I want to see how badly an 8 year old chip does.

Click to expand...

How many desktop do you owned it at your home???

I have a few. I own 3 personally (3700+ rig, Q8300 rig, 2500K rig), my Dad has a few, and my brother and my mum have a PC each.

vistakid10 said:

I have a few. I own 3 personally (3700+ rig, Q8300 rig, 2500K rig), my Dad has a few, and my brother and my mum have a PC each.

Click to expand...

You're crazy lol. But I'm little crazy too I have one desktop and one 11 years old laptop.