|Official| Smiles Benchmark 2.0 Ranking Thread! (new version :P)

Can you have a benchmark processing bar that looks something like loading bar? The benchmark stops working for a minute or 2

Ankur said:

Can you have a benchmark processing bar that looks something like loading bar? The benchmark stops working for a minute or 2

Click to expand...

Just let it benchmark and be sure to close all program and apps you running. Don't do anything while benchmark it. And that is 3 minute or so.

3 minutes and 6 seconds to be exact.

4 thread


8 thread


specs in siggy. No OC, 1066 ram speed, gtx 480.

This thread grew ultra fast and I don't really have time to walk through 23 pages to see if someone else has already asked this, but are you planning on making this open source?

I'm really just curious to know what algorithms you're using in your test. But also knowing that your code isn't stealing my cc info would be cool too.

SmileMan said no to open source.

Ankur, I will look into adding a progress bar. I am aware that the benchmark appears to stop responding. The latest version does warn you about this. As soon as you click 'Benchmark' a message box should appear warning you that the benchmark may appear to stop responding but really is still benching.

Yea I know about that message about not responding, I suggested that because the end users will like a progress bar, I suggested this assuming you guys are making this commercial.
BTW if you want to make it more popular add this in my tech blog I get over 300 page views per day over there.

I will take a look tomorrow or tonight and see if there's anything I can do about a progress bar.

I'll speak to Smiles about advertising it on your blog, sure he'll be OK with it. I've put a link to this thread on my blog too.

Hey it is not advertising, I will just add this in the Windows tools section for free. I will post a back link to this CF thread if you guys like .

Yeah a link to this thread would be preferable over hosting it on your site please.

MyCattMaxx said:

SmileMan said no to open source.

Click to expand...

Fair enough. I'm still curious to know if the algorithm will at least be released?

Like are you benchmarking by calculating pi?

Or by calculating primes?

I simply ask because if you're just adding up numbers or something else silly.

It will probably get optimized out by the compiler. (Depending on the language, I know Java will). Or the overhead of the loop will cost more time than the actual arithmetic. And then you're just testing nothing.

we are seriously testing something, look into the differences between the times. That says enough...

are you ever going to update the leaderboard? Or are we posting our scores for no reason at all?

Sorry about the wait. Got quite a few new scores to add, so without further a do...

Current Scores!

*Times are in seconds. Lower is better!

*All CPU clockspeeds are stock unless otherwise stated.

Top 15 Heavy 4-Threaded:

1. Laquer Head - i7 3770K 5.0 - 16G RipJaws-X 1600 - 89.2945568
2. vistakid10 - i5 2500K 4.3 - 16G RipJaws-X 1648 - 98.4861003
3. KasperL - i7 3930K - 16G DDR3 - 109.4273062
4. SmileMan - i7 2600K - 16G Hyper-X 1600 - 111.4573749
5. wolfeking - i7 2600K - 8G DDR3 - 118.0815084
6. Jamebonds1 - i3 540 4.6 - 4G Patriot 1230 - 119.7926104
7. jimkonow - i7 3770S - 16G RipJaws-X - 120.9002124
8. Linkin - i5 2500K - 8G RipJaws-X 1600 - 122.7400203
9. Laquer Head - i7 3610QM - 16G Vengeance 1866 - 129.368
10. jonnyp11 - X4 960T 3.8 (Unlocked to X6) - 8G Kingston 1333 - 151.3961111
11. Hyper-Threaded - X4 855 - 4G RipJaws-X 1333 - 154.7522698
12. FuryRosewood - X4 955 - 16G Crucial 1333 - 156.2702156
13. johnb35 - X4 965 - 8G Vengeance 1600 - 165.6566888
14. Claptonman - FX-6100 4.3 - 8G RipJaws-X 1600 - 166.0312869
15. vistakid10 - Q8300 - 4G DDR2 667 - 171.42

Top 15 Light 8-Threaded:

1. Laquer Head - i7 3770K 5.0 - 16G RipJaws-X 1600 - 16.7232294
2. jimkonow - i7 3770S - 16G RipJaws-X - 18.153434
3. SmileMan - i7 2600K - 16G Hyper-X 1600 - 18.8240766
4. wolfeking - i7 2600K - 8G DDR3 - 20.3892358
5. Laquer Head - i7 3610QM - 16G Vengeance 1866 - 20.5764361
6. Jamebonds1 - i3 540 4.72 - 4G Patriot 1230 - 20.6700364
7. Claptonman - FX-6100 4.3 - 8G RipJaws-X 1600 - 21.4390775
8. vistakid10 - i5 2500K 4.3 - 16G RipJaws-X 1648 - 27.6008391
9. jonnyp11 - X4 960T 3.8 - 8G Kingston 1333 - 28.297828
10. Hyper-Threaded - X4 855 - 4G RipJaws-X 1333 - 30.1080525
11. FuryRosewood - X4 955 - 16G Crucial 1333 - 34.6200479
12. johnb35 - X4 965 - 8G Vengeance 1600 - 34.8505607
13. vistakid10 - Q8300 - 4G DDR2 667 - 48.701
14. vistakid10 - 3700+ - 1G DDR - 221.53125

Remember if your CPU and/or RAM is overclocked to say so in your post or write it in your signature!

If any information here is incorrect, please let me know ASP and I will correct it.

When we get more AMD submissions, I'll break the categories down into Intel and AMD. Right now there are not enough AMD entries really to warrant doing this.

Vista I am just curious at what frequency is KasperL's 3930K running, how did the hex core did not beat quad?

Ankur said:

Vista I am just curious at what frequency is KasperL's 3930K running, how did the hex core did not beat quad?

Click to expand...

His 3930K is running at stock, don't think it's been overclocked.

Just noticed this, but both my 1st place scores were done at 5.0GHZ.. not 5.2

Edited.

Check spell of my member username "mebonds1" on top 25 light thread

Corrected. Sorry about that!