*STABLE* Black Hole Benchmark

Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
Denther said:
And here's my 8320 at stock. Windows was telling me that I only had 3 threads running during the 4 thread test. It was, 1, 3, and 7 for some weird reason. I feel like it's done that before too. Edit: Ran just 4 threads again and it gave me the same score but showed 4 cores (1, 3, 5, and 7) running that time.

6KGX3xf.png
Click to expand...

You had the 4threaded bug. This bug happens with some FX 8 core or i7 setups. The benchmark tries to run the 4 threads on only 2 of the 4 physicals. Running it a second time should solve it.

Edit: weird that you didn't get an higher score when running it again?
 
Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
spirit said:
Not quite sure what's up with the appearance of Black Hole (looks like Calin had the same problem too, maybe it's our screen resolutions?) but here is an i5 4200M. It's about on par with an i3 3220 and a Core 2 Quad Q8300.

BlackHolei54200M_zpsfc04526c.png
Click to expand...

Finally got that thinkpad? :p
Nice score btw.
Yea, I saw that bug with the design earlier.
 
Darren

Darren

Moderator
Staff member
That's decently higher than the 4200U. Also, we need to have a talk about your background.
 
Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
Just to say ****it to the old:
The newest Haswell refresh: the i7 4790 (non-K) at a stock speed of 3.6GHz
AfI8swK.png


The review on BlackHoleTec follow soon!
However, the only real improvement is the advanced TIM...
 
Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
Tried some overclocking, this is how far I could get the chip: 3956MHz base and 4148MHz turbo. Higher block would instantly crash.
UtmhNJN.png


Sad that this chip isn't unlocked, I got so nice temperatures... Anyway, I achieved an higher score than I thought I could squeeze out it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top