Is that the fastest server you found too?Had AT&T's 'Gigabit' installed today at our new house, doesn't seem very gigish...
No real issues downloading. The only real problem is latency for multiplayer gaming.
I don't think it's it's flash performance, as even my old phones can nearly max out my 150Mbps connection. I'd put my blame on the wireless chip in the Chromebook.Samsung Chromebook over 5Ghz, The Exynos doesn't have enough grunt to push more flash performance lol
Seems kind of low real-world bandwidth for 802.11ac wave1. This crappy Almond+ router doesn't allow you to turn off the wireless repeater when in bridge mode (hooray for rebroadcasting on the same frequency for the same LAN traffic)...
Are you using an 80MHz-wide channel?Eh, it's amusing watching it chug and dip fps just trying to update the tach. I think the phone client doesn't have the web abstraction layer as well.
I feel icky using this wireless bridge but it's all I have for the moment in my new place
The topology is a fraction of what it once was
I am honestly impressed you can negotiate a rate above a few Mb/s with a -96dBm signal. Usually anything above -80dBm is practically unusable.Yeah, -96 dbm signal looks pretty crap but the speeds are pretty consistent to when they were a couple feet away from each other too.. That and the device is only about 15 feet away through one, wood wall.
They didn't have any promos for the 150 plan, so I downgraded to the 105 plan with basic cable for $69.99 for 12 months.And the cycle continues
paying for the 200mb service...
