Official - Unigine Valley Benchmark Ranking thread

Darren

Moderator
Staff member
The 280X was only $175 on Newegg at the time! Only $10 more then the 270X I was going to get hehehe..

That's insanely good. I payed 150 for mine (well 7970) used on Ebay in August. It was even faulty. :p
 

C4C

Well-Known Member
Hey Darren... Look at meeee! :p

Overclocked my CPU from 3.7GHz (turbo to 4GHz) to 4.2GHz and BAM! Stock cooling kept it somewhat cool with the peak being 78 Celsius.

abc69b1cc8c28f6ed066d15d346acbaf.png
 
Just ran this on mine. With this score, do you think I am bottlenecked by the processor, or am I pretty even. I have noticed in some of the games I play, my processor is not going to 100%

1yoheg.jpg
 
Last edited:

C4C

Well-Known Member
Not sure you're really bottlenecked too much by the CPU, but a little overclocking on both the card & CPU should bring your score up quite a bit.

As far as your CPU not reaching 100%, it means that you aren't underpowered.. example: Hitman 5 uses more of my CPU then CS:GO because it's a "heavier" game
 

Darren

Moderator
Staff member
You'll get bottlenecked in some games by the 965 but it's still is a pretty capable gaming processor. Compared to Jason's score you're pretty similar and his CPU is definitely better than the 965.

I think it's interesting that the 7970 GHz/R9 280X score so closely to the 760 in this benchmark but in most games the R9 is a fair bit ahead.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1031?vs=1038
 

spirit

Moderator
Staff member
Actually the scores posted by CorruptHawkeyez with the 4.0GHz Phenom II X4 965 and the 2GB GTX 760 are better than the scores from me with my 4.3GHz i5 2500KK and a 4GB GTX 760! My 4GB GTX 760 has a factory overclock too!

The score, max FPS and overall FPS are higher than mine!
 
Last edited:
A little hint for ya spirit...go into your Nvidia Control Panel then go into your 3d settings and turn off some stuff in there that has to do with antialiasing and application controlled stuff. Also change it from quality to high performance. This is just for benching. You can turn them back on and set it back to quality afterwards.
 

Cyphor

New Member
I know the graphic card is low end evga 750 ti at 2gb it will be soon replaced.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    94.4 KB · Views: 38
Last edited:

Darren

Moderator
Staff member
Run it in the Extreme HD option to get a better comparison with the rest as that's what most people have been doing. ^^
 

C4C

Well-Known Member
Got my CPU up to 4.3 and we're stable... using AMD OverDrive (NOT Catalyst Control)....

Best score yet... Time to get my CPU cooler and go on the quest to 4.5 :)

cefe021fa01ce31406c6ebff363abc26.png
 

Calin

Well-Known Member
I haven't been active for almost one year.
But anyway, I got my new card yesterday and here is my score. It says it only has 4GB of VRAM because the driver doesn't like Win 10.
0906372f3ce1b4342743320af405a9b9.png
 

Okedokey

Well-Known Member
Goobs, you wanna get another 2 x 4 gb so you can run your ram in quad channel! Also, that 5820 should get to 4.75GHz quite easily. You could also run another 980ti on that PSU. :)
 

Gooberman

Active Member
I plan on getting a couple more sticks in the next month or so, i kinda spent a decent amount over the past week so i want to hold out on that. I had a single 8 GB stick in there for a bit. Looked so lonely by itself.
 

tylerjrb

Member
The 980ti's are looking very good, will be another few weeks for my 2 to come in stock. I wouldn't think you could go much farther on the 5820k unless it's under a custom loop. The 6 cores get really hot.

You'd be cutting it short on a 750w PSU, mine according to corsair link use just over 700w on max load. And they are 980's.

Scores are looking good though!
 
Last edited:
Top