Amd's 65nm Processor Benchmarks!

[holyjunk]

We are seeing closer performancerice ratio. Though the cd2 is still a better choice Amd I must say is doing a tremendous job with their too old architecture. We will have to wait for overclocking results to see what they can really do though. Amd I think are very good still. I never saw Intel doing this with their dreaded Netburst.
http://translate.google.com/transla...&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=/language_tools

 

[Geoff]

Looks pretty good, but I still wouldnt recommend it over the Core 2 Duo. Remember, they're benching the lowest of the C2D line and the mid-ranged 4400+ of the AMD line.

 

[holyjunk]

We are seeing closer performancerice ratio. Though the cd2 is still a better choice Amd I must say is doing a tremendous job with their too old architecture.

Looks pretty good, but I still wouldnt recommend it over the Core 2 Duo. Remember, they're benching the lowest of the C2D line and the mid-ranged 4400+ of the AMD line.

Ya, I think that too. Though there is about a $35 difference. But you can agree with me that Amd is doing very good about extending their k8. (<Think that is right)

 

[Bl00dFox]

Well, thats one step for AMD

 

[Archangel]

Looks pretty good, but I still wouldnt recommend it over the Core 2 Duo. Remember, they're benching the lowest of the C2D line and the mid-ranged 4400+ of the AMD line.

eh.. you could compare the e6400 to the 4400+.. those are about the same position in line of the series..
But, as you can see.. AMD's finally comming on a roll again, looking forward to it

 

[Grey410]

Can anyone say "price drops". Hehe I hope.