Oh I'm not even worried about the comparison to the 5ghz chip. As stated in my previous post, I'm questioning the stability of that 5ghz clock.
But with the stock vs stock, the lower dip sucks. Luckily it's not low to the point of unplayable (<20fps). I would rather have a lower max, than a super low min fps. A high max, high avg, but low min suggests big spikes/stutters in game, for which I hate. Much rather have a lower max, higher avg, and higher min. Think of it like a bell curve distribution, but skewed to the right.
Keep in mind though, this hype for the chip is getting pretty wild. People are expecting performance better than what we have already, and that's well... not really true. The thing to take out of Ryzen is that we're getting performance at a lower price point, which will allow AMD to craw back some market share. This doesn't mean that we're getting faster chips than what Intel is making with the Kaby Lakes for average joes who won't benefit from high multi-core processing. However, it's great news for all consumers, both AMD and Intel users, as competition lowers cost (hopefully).
The hype for this thing is way too damn high though. High hopes = higher chance of disappointment. This kinda applies for everything and not just in this particular situation. So to all of you who read this, calm down and let's see what happens when it does eventually come out.