Sticky: Official CPU-Z Benchmark Thread

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by Darren, Sep 29, 2016.

  1. Virssagòn

    Virssagòn VIP Member

    Messages:
    3,315
    Here you go:
    [​IMG]

    It's my 2-3 year old laptop, still not complaining..
     
  2. Calin

    Calin Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,537
    I put the old 6700k in my secondary rig, so since the CPU-Z scoring has changed here's the score so that you have more submissions.
    It's at stock but turbos up to 4.2. No further OC because 5$ cooler
    [​IMG]
     
    Darren likes this.
  3. Intel_man

    Intel_man VIP Member

    Messages:
    5,634
  4. Darren

    Darren Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,636
    Image only shows up when I quote it...?

    I'll see if I have time this weekend to get it up to date, got finals next week though so might have to wait till after that.
     
  5. Virssagòn

    Virssagòn VIP Member

    Messages:
    3,315
    Ryzen 7 1700X @ 4.1GHz. I feel like I've still some headroom left as I'm running 60°c max without the T offset
    upload_2017-5-15_10-54-11.png
     
  6. Darren

    Darren Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,636
    This will get updated once I have my tower back up and running.
     
  7. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,162
    The classic stall-until-you-can-get-#1 tactic I see :p
     
    Darren likes this.
  8. Darren

    Darren Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,636
    Nah just don't feel like messing with spreadsheets on this dinky little 768p screen. I need my 1440p display to get good screenshots of the leaderboards.

    I don't think I'll ever beat that 1700X score @Virssagòn just threw down.
     
  9. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,162
    Just buy a dual socket Epyc, 64c/128t should get you there.
     
    Intel_man and Darren like this.
  10. Virssagòn

    Virssagòn VIP Member

    Messages:
    3,315
    Seems like 4.15GHz is the golden number for me. I need more then 1.48V to run the chip stable at 4.2GHz; which is not a risk I want to take with a full 8core and just watercooling.
     
  11. Intel_man

    Intel_man VIP Member

    Messages:
    5,634
    [​IMG]

    Dat single core performance though... holy.
     
  12. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,162
    Wouldn't nearly all of that be attributed to the clock speed increase? :p
     
  13. Darren

    Darren Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,636
    I hope that voltage isn't right or they're running LN2. Also thanks for the bump, desperately need to update this.
     
  14. Intel_man

    Intel_man VIP Member

    Messages:
    5,634
    I'm not sure about the voltage. 4.4ghz shouldn't even be under LN2 scenarios. Turbo boost is suppose to go to 4.5 anyways.
     
  15. Darren

    Darren Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,636
    CPU-Z has been doubling my CPU voltage the last couple versions so meh. I don't put much stock in it.
     
  16. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,162
    I edited out your f bombs, not sure why that would be remotely anything to be butt hurt about.

    Enjoying the new rig?
     
  17. Laquer Head

    Laquer Head Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,226
    Yeah its good thanks!
     
  18. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,162
    Have you tried anything beyond 5ghz?
     
  19. Laquer Head

    Laquer Head Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,226
    Yup was running it at 5.2 for a bit last evening.. temps went up to the 80's but I also need to play around with it more..this week is hell so I'm gonna have fun this weekend with the wife and play some games, overclock, and tweak some more settings..
     
  20. beers

    beers Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,162
    What's this look like these days for you fools?

    I was excited that this new BIOS could push my RAM to 3200 so here's at 3.8 GHz:

    [​IMG]
     
    Darren likes this.

Share This Page