card vs card.

[striker]

Which of these are better? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102084 or http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814133197? Or if there are any better cards then these in the same price range. please share.

 

[reddevil6]

the x1650 will kill the 8500

 

[UpskirtHayley]

they both suck but the 8500gt will kill the x1650



http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=504&card2=514

 

[ducis]

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/graphics-cards/3dmark06-v1-0-2-hdr-sm3-0-score,538.html
from this its pretty oblivious the x1650xt is a much much better card
idk what upskirthayley based here answer on other then specs

 

[UpskirtHayley]

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/graphics-cards/3dmark06-v1-0-2-hdr-sm3-0-score,538.html
from this its pretty oblivious the x1650xt is a much much better card
idk what upskirthayley based here answer on other then specs

please read the posts carefully before making any assumption. you understanding it is the xt.... but in fact it is the regular x1650.



heres the x1650 vs 8500gt on oblivion bench
http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/...-elder-scrolls-4-outdoor,568.html?p=1603,1621

note: toms chart dont seems to have the x1650 there.... so the x1600 pro can be use as it is very similar and equivalent to the x1650.

refference: http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=350&card2=504

 

[daisymtc]

2600XT is $50-60 after re-bate, why not 2600XT?

 

[lovely?]

get this if you can: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102725

its an ATI 3650. it uses ddr3, which pretty much guarentee's better performance then the 8500GT, and even though the 2600XT uses fast clocks, its a despicable card.

EDIT: here the card is benchmarked with a few other cards, and it clearly beats the 8600GT, albeit i think they might be using the ddr2 version. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=985&num=4