OK so i was on Tgdaily.com (i donno if anyone reads that), but alota ppl was like wow chromes so cool .. "its so fast", well i am a big fan of google too.. but this ..
i personally think its no faster than FF3 in terms of rendering pages, though i know its only a beta it does have a few issues i'll name the biggest issues i can think of.
firstly why put the tab bar at the top? i mean most peoples mouses usually sit somewhere near like eye level right? so when the tab bar is at the bottom of all the stuff (like in ff3) its faster to click right? but chrome has it at the top? which means further even thou its only like 2cm further away u can still feel it.
2ndly if ur a avid internet surfer like me and go on wikipedia and open a tab for everything interesting to read later, then u end up with 20+ tabs alot, first not about this they shrink the tabs and when u have 20+ tabs u an't read the name of the tabs(very annoying), 2ndly 20+ tabs on chrome uses 25% of my processing power non-stop (i'm running a e6400 at 3.2ghz(x2)) 25%!!! thats heaps ff3 only uses like 1%, anyone else experianced this?
another annoying thing is that if you close the browser it won't save your tabs, i hate having 2 open all my tabs again back in ff2 but when ff3 came out i was like this is awesome, chome doesn't seem 2 do that
no true zooming, jst like IE and saffari(well last time i check), it only has text zooming, so if your like me and bit blind and want to zoom into pictures too then .. chrome won't do this unlike the tech FF3 which has true zooming which is like awesome!!!
it also uses slightly more ram!, open source!! so less secure... (as ppl can jst get the scource)
I'm gona stick with my FF3, just as fast if not faster, better tab positioning, and doesn't use 25% of my cpu power just to have 20+ tabs open.
maybe i'm jst a fanboy .. or maybe FF3 is jst better...
What do u guys think?
i personally think its no faster than FF3 in terms of rendering pages, though i know its only a beta it does have a few issues i'll name the biggest issues i can think of.
firstly why put the tab bar at the top? i mean most peoples mouses usually sit somewhere near like eye level right? so when the tab bar is at the bottom of all the stuff (like in ff3) its faster to click right? but chrome has it at the top? which means further even thou its only like 2cm further away u can still feel it.
2ndly if ur a avid internet surfer like me and go on wikipedia and open a tab for everything interesting to read later, then u end up with 20+ tabs alot, first not about this they shrink the tabs and when u have 20+ tabs u an't read the name of the tabs(very annoying), 2ndly 20+ tabs on chrome uses 25% of my processing power non-stop (i'm running a e6400 at 3.2ghz(x2)) 25%!!! thats heaps ff3 only uses like 1%, anyone else experianced this?
another annoying thing is that if you close the browser it won't save your tabs, i hate having 2 open all my tabs again back in ff2 but when ff3 came out i was like this is awesome, chome doesn't seem 2 do that
no true zooming, jst like IE and saffari(well last time i check), it only has text zooming, so if your like me and bit blind and want to zoom into pictures too then .. chrome won't do this unlike the tech FF3 which has true zooming which is like awesome!!!
it also uses slightly more ram!, open source!! so less secure... (as ppl can jst get the scource)
I'm gona stick with my FF3, just as fast if not faster, better tab positioning, and doesn't use 25% of my cpu power just to have 20+ tabs open.
maybe i'm jst a fanboy .. or maybe FF3 is jst better...
What do u guys think?