Yeah, you clocked the hell out of your i3 xD. And you still not getting better then my stock i7 that takes 18s
Take it like a challenge, if you can get under 18 with your cpu. You can name yourself a boss ;D
No worries. If you've got decent cooling and a good board and case you should try overclocking 3930K - would be interesting to see what scores you'd get.I know you're using 16GB of RAM, what's the make and model of the RAM?
I'll add your scores to the new leaderboard when I get it up tomorrow or Friday most probably.![]()
Nah Claptonman if you're trying for the slowest score possible I tried with an Athlon 64 3700+ and got 953 seconds on the heavy bench and 221 seconds on the light bench.
Which Athlon has he got? If it's an X2, you've got no chance, my 3700+ is a sole-core from 2005!But gonna beat you with his athlon xD
I will throw some up for the 8 and 4 when the 4 is fixed at least for AMD processors.
I will throw some up for the 8 and 4 when the 4 is fixed at least for AMD processors.
FX-8120 @ 4.5ghz. With DDR3 2000 4gb. 8 Threaded.
![]()
![]()
What kind of CPU cooler do you used?
If you get a 32-Bit executable going i could run it on my CF-T4, it likely will be quite a bit slower than the 3700+
Dont think so, atleast for a FX on the 4 threaded one. If so how could johnb35 Phenom II 965 at 3.4ghz. beat Claptonman FX-6100 at 4.3ghz with 165.65 to 166.03. Plus the 4 threaded one uses more then 4 cores if you have a 6 or 8 core. If thats the case Claptonman could have beat it by alot.