WHO Has not upgraded to a dual core

Christian Darrall

Active Member
Well after seeing most ppeople on this forum have dual core its hard to pick out the single core people,

Who on this forum has not got a dual core processor and why,

also with at least 512mb of ram
 

Kornowski

VIP Member
I don't have one...

Why: Just got a new motherboard, Don't have the money, Don't see how it would benefit me...
 

Shane

Super Moderator
Staff member
Same here,

Dont have the funds yet to spash out on a new pc...Im saving.


My current machine meets all my requirements at the moment but at a later date i would like a more up todate one.
 

Christian Darrall

Active Member
Don't see how it would benefit me...
thats a first, arn't dual core supposed to be more energy efficient also alot faster and more reliable,

i suppose they are expensive but the cheapest one ive seen was an intel D for 74.99 at pc world, which in fairness is cheap
 

Shane

Super Moderator
Staff member
thats a first, arn't dual core supposed to be more energy efficient also alot faster and more reliable,

i suppose they are expensive but the cheapest one ive seen was an intel D for 74.99 at pc world, which in fairness is cheap

If your talking about Intel celeron D that is not dual core....

People commonly mistake the D as to meaning Dual core but infact it just stands for Desktop.
 

Shady

<b>VIP Member</b>
I still have my P4 2.8 Ghz and 1GB DDR 400
I'm still looking for the perfect price\performance ratio and I will get a dual or quad as soon as I find it.
 

Sacrinyellow5

New Member
I still have my P4 2.8 Ghz and 1GB DDR 400
I'm still looking for the perfect price\performance ratio and I will get a dual or quad as soon as I find it.


I still have a 2.2 Ghz and it does fine for me. I'm not a super big gamer, so I havent really upgraded to a faster processor. In the next year or so I will probably start working on a new pc and it will probably be dual core.
 

codeman0013

Active Member
I have a p4 prescott core 3.2ghz and it works amazing for me on vista with 2gig ram i have no need to upgrade and spend the money on a new mobo and processor my comptuer is plenty fast for everythign i use it on..
 

Jet

VIP Member
I do have a dual core, and I got it right when it came out. I'm glad I made my choice, but many people just do not use the extra power, so it isn't needed. For me, thought, having dual core for Folding@Home is a bonus.
 

Geoff

VIP Member
I upgraded to a Pentium D 930
Downgraded to an Athlon 64 3400+
Downgraded to a Pentium 4 2.2
Upgraded to a Sempron 2500+
Upgraded to a Core 2 Duo E6300
Downgraded to a Pentium 4 631
 
Last edited:

Shane

Super Moderator
Staff member
[-0MEGA-];550681 said:
I upgraded to a Pentium D 930
Upgraded to an Athlon 64 3400+
Downgraded to a Pentium 4 2.2
Upgraded to a Sempron 2500+
Upgraded to a Core 2 Duo E6300
Downgraded to a Pentium 4 631

Lol why?

I would have kept the C2D
 

palidon112

New Member
im using a p4 640, and it gets the job done, but next summer im going to upgrade, likely to buy a quadcore, or whatever is most powerful at that time period.
 

apj101

VIP Member
[-0MEGA-];550711 said:
Because when I buy something, I realize that it was a waste of money and I downgrade, then I feel that it was dumb to lose performance so I upgrade again :D

Theres a lesson there geoff, I mean....even animals can learn :D :D jk
 

The_Other_One

VIP Member
If you're building/purchasing a new computer, try and get a duel core processor. Normal use, it's nothing too much better. However, I have had programs lock up(taking up 100% CPU utilization and what not) and I kept working not even realizing something "bad" was going on :rolleyes:
 

mrbagrat

banned
It hasn't arrived yet but my next build in about a week will have an E6400. But now no. A 2.13GHz Celeron D is what I'm stuck with.
 
Top