DDR 2 ram??

Twigy

New Member
hi, i have a gigabyte GA-81945G mobo i know its DDR2 667MHZ but what is this EG: PC5400... and some others types

tks
 
Last edited:
[-0MEGA-];753556 said:
PC5300 would be DDR, it would be PC2 if it was DDR2.

PC2-5300 is the same thing as DDR2 667, and the same goes for PC2-6400.

urm so whats the best ddr2 667mhz 1gb ram not (2x512) ?? on sale?
 
Last edited:
i just want the fastest ddr2 667mhz Ram out there i dont care for the money un less its over $200 for 2 gb i rly want 1gb (1x1gb) not (2x512)


thanks
 
[-0MEGA-];753556 said:
PC5300 would be DDR, it would be PC2 if it was DDR2.

PC2-5300 is the same thing as DDR2 667, and the same goes for PC2-6400.

I have never seen 184pin PC5300 RAM. In fact most people don't even bother to put Pc2-5300 or ddr2-667. It's usually just left out except by the manufactures.
 
I have never seen 184pin PC5300 RAM. In fact most people don't even bother to put Pc2-5300 or ddr2-667. It's usually just left out except by the manufactures.
They dont, the highest i've seen was DDR500 (PC 4000).

The point I was trying to make is that DDR is called PC2, and no manufacturer i've seen has left it out. If people called it PC-5300, then they are wrong, it's like calling it DDR 667 when it's in fact DDR2.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...Subcategory=147&description=&Ntk=&srchInDesc=
 
[-0MEGA-];754395 said:
They dont, the highest i've seen was DDR500 (PC 4000).

The point I was trying to make is that DDR is called PC2, and no manufacturer i've seen has left it out. If people called it PC-5300, then they are wrong, it's like calling it DDR 667 when it's in fact DDR2.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...Subcategory=147&description=&Ntk=&srchInDesc=

Wrong shmong. If I say Pc5300, then you, and most everyone else, know exactly what I'm talking about. Putting the 2 in is a tad redundant IMO, And If you pulled that stick of RAM outa your ass you might feel the same way. :D

(sounds mean, Now that I think about it. I don't mean offense, you just kinda seem alittle uptight... Screw the "right" way, I say. If it's not broken don't fix it)
 
Wrong shmong. If I say Pc5300, then you, and most everyone else, know exactly what I'm talking about. Putting the 2 in is a tad redundant IMO, And If you pulled that stick of RAM outa your ass you might feel the same way. :D

(sounds mean, Now that I think about it. I don't mean offense, you just kinda seem alittle uptight... Screw the "right" way, I say. If it's not broken don't fix it)
I really don't care what you call it, but technically calling it PC5300 is WRONG!

Lets forget the "2" then, so because were all so lazy lets call it ddr800, core duo, core quad. Oh heck lets just say pci for video cards sense no one uses the real PCI anymore......
 
[-0MEGA-];754448 said:
I really don't care what you call it, but technically calling it PC5300 is WRONG!

Lets forget the "2" then, so because were all so lazy lets call it ddr800, core duo, core quad. Oh heck lets just say pci for video cards sense no one uses the real PCI anymore......

You're getting the hang of it! Loosen up, lol. If the world ends tomorrow you're not going to want to say that the last fight you had was over RAM naming convention. Spice it up man.

But forgetting 2 altogether is a bit drastic don't you think? I mean where would the world be without 2? You've gone a bit overboard, Methinks, my friend....
 
Back
Top