Ivy-Bridge

jonnyp11

jonnyp11

New Member
Saw a line-up post on Anandtech.com and thought i'd post it. Noticed that even the 3770K is listed as only a 77w TDP, wondering if that is actually correct.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5166/ivy-bridge-overview

Also what are all those things that the 3770 has checked but the K doesn't? Just thought there's normally a thread for upcoming launches and i haven't seen one for the Ivy-Bridge line-up yet.
 
Perkomate

Perkomate

Active Member
jonnyp11 said:
Saw a line-up post on Anandtech.com and thought i'd post it. Noticed that even the 3770K is listed as only a 77w TDP, wondering if that is actually correct.
Click to expand...

yeah, i rekon that'll be right. Intel's being really big on low power usage/heat right now. They're still hitting 3.5ghz, so that's actually pretty damn amazing.

Might have to save up a heap of money though, if the pricing goes the way all their products have as of late.
 
jonnyp11

jonnyp11

New Member
I'm now wondering if their main focus while moving to 22nm was TDP not performance. Also I doubt they will cost too much since they are like sandy was to Bloomfield and Lynnfeild. Those 2 were bothe near the 300 dollar mark, some under and some over. I think the 3770k would most likely be around the 350-370 point, but then again the 2700k that is solely different by a single multiplier costs like 30 more I think it was, which I think is both a rip off and assenine on their part.
 
Perkomate

Perkomate

Active Member
jonnyp11 said:
I'm now wondering if their main focus while moving to 22nm was TDP not performance. Also I doubt they will cost too much since they are like sandy was to Bloomfield and Lynnfeild. Those 2 were bothe near the 300 dollar mark, some under and some over. I think the 3770k would most likely be around the 350-370 point, but then again the 2700k that is solely different by a single multiplier costs like 30 more I think it was, which I think is both a rip off and assenine on their part.
Click to expand...

I think their goal was performance at a low power/heat level. They'll 99% keep downsizing until they hit 5nm, which is the limit of silicon.

Also, it means siiick overclocking.
 
Ankur

Ankur

Active Member
Good article, not a big surprise seen in it, just the mobile CPUs would be good to see because of low power usage.
Hopefully it is more than 20% faster than Sandy Bridge.
 
maroon1

maroon1

New Member
Ivy+Bridge+benchmark+w.jpg
 
Perkomate

Perkomate

Active Member
...and then to that you add the lower TDP so higher overclocking, and you end up with one hell of a chip. Hopefully.

-EDIT-
Also, the 3d transisitors and the smaller process.
 
jonnyp11

jonnyp11

New Member
Perkomate said:
...and then to that you add the lower TDP so higher overclocking, and you end up with one hell of a chip. Hopefully.

-EDIT-
Also, the 3d transisitors and the smaller process.
Click to expand...

you forgot beastliness, it's got soooo much of that stuff :p
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top