Bl00dFox New Member Feb 12, 2007 #1 Very simple question. Is dual channel really that good? Would you keep the 1 GB (2*512) in dual channel or would you rather have the 1.5GB (3*512) in single channel? Thanks guys
Very simple question. Is dual channel really that good? Would you keep the 1 GB (2*512) in dual channel or would you rather have the 1.5GB (3*512) in single channel? Thanks guys
Geoff VIP Member Feb 12, 2007 #2 IMO I would go with the 1.5GB, especially if you have alot of background apps running while gaming.
S Schonza Member Feb 12, 2007 #3 Well, I tried this once in my system, and I got 1.5gb running in dual channel asymmetric (whatever that means) and yes it was with 3*512 MB.
Well, I tried this once in my system, and I got 1.5gb running in dual channel asymmetric (whatever that means) and yes it was with 3*512 MB.
Shane Super Moderator Staff member Feb 12, 2007 #4 I would also go with the 1.5Gb(Single channel) instead of dual channel....the more ram the better imo.
I would also go with the 1.5Gb(Single channel) instead of dual channel....the more ram the better imo.
The_Other_One VIP Member Feb 12, 2007 #5 I've never done a direct comparison, but personally I'd go with duel channel. 1GB is typically plenty.
I've never done a direct comparison, but personally I'd go with duel channel. 1GB is typically plenty.
Bl00dFox New Member Feb 12, 2007 #6 The_Other_One said: I've never done a direct comparison, but personally I'd go with duel channel. 1GB is typically plenty. Click to expand... not with vista lol ty for ur help - i just got another 1 GB (no i have 4*512 in DC mode) Thanks again for your endeavours to help me out!
The_Other_One said: I've never done a direct comparison, but personally I'd go with duel channel. 1GB is typically plenty. Click to expand... not with vista lol ty for ur help - i just got another 1 GB (no i have 4*512 in DC mode) Thanks again for your endeavours to help me out!