Okedokey
Well-Known Member
Linus shows the difference here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUkvhOhrDVk
2500K vs 1100T
- Thread starter Okedokey
- Start date
What is it with you continually hitting on AMD. I'm gad you got a 2600k, but you can get over yourself by now.
You do know when AMD released the Athlon/Athlon 64 it took intel with all the money in research and development (over) 6 years to release a processor that could beat it clock for clock.
The Core 2 came out in 2006. AMD has had what, 5 years now to counter it, and Zambezi it coming out in a month or two. Pretty good for a company with 10% the amount of money.
If you compare the amount of money Intel has vs. AMD. Intel is the fat woman that cant even get through the door to the dance floor.
You do know when AMD released the Athlon/Athlon 64 it took intel with all the money in research and development (over) 6 years to release a processor that could beat it clock for clock.
The Core 2 came out in 2006. AMD has had what, 5 years now to counter it, and Zambezi it coming out in a month or two. Pretty good for a company with 10% the amount of money.
If you compare the amount of money Intel has vs. AMD. Intel is the fat woman that cant even get through the door to the dance floor.
Last edited:
Aastii
VIP Member
QFT. I don't favour either, but you have to admire what AMD are able to accomplish with what they have, and you have to remember that your AMD chips are still more than able to perform every single task you throw at it and are by no means bad chips, as much as certain members on the forum try to make out
Okedokey
Well-Known Member
Not sure where the sensitivity came from strangle. I'm not even talking about a 2600k, but even if i was, i don't think i need to ask your permission 
I also have AMD systems, and an ATi graphics cards. In fact, i have always provide opinions and facts from others. My opinion is that i hope AMD come up with something great, which is what i have said over and over again.
The point of this post is that I simply thought it was interesting since he is a very good presenter, and is presenting somewhat of an answer to what is generally speculation, particularly when he is basically taking out the gpu as a limiting factor. We have had this discussion before, and if i wish i will continue to have it in the future. It is good to be able to see real world comparisons, not sure why that is a bad thing.
I also have AMD systems, and an ATi graphics cards. In fact, i have always provide opinions and facts from others. My opinion is that i hope AMD come up with something great, which is what i have said over and over again.The point of this post is that I simply thought it was interesting since he is a very good presenter, and is presenting somewhat of an answer to what is generally speculation, particularly when he is basically taking out the gpu as a limiting factor. We have had this discussion before, and if i wish i will continue to have it in the future. It is good to be able to see real world comparisons, not sure why that is a bad thing.
Last edited:
jonnyp11
New Member
darn fanbows and their fanboyishness, we get that you take you 2600k out and make love to it every night, no need to tell us more about it, and no need to kick amd while they're down either, especially while your doing that to your cpu at the same time, that's just nasty and mean.
Okedokey
Well-Known Member
lol whatever, i couldn't careless about the brand, im interested in the technology and the product. i really don't have any emotional connections as some members of the forum seem to have. 
Now can i get on with having a discussion with other members of the forum about the chips? Would that be too much to ask?
Now can i get on with having a discussion with other members of the forum about the chips? Would that be too much to ask?
Last edited:
spynoodle
Active Member
Not any sensitivity. Its called sensibility.
I said, I knew you had one.
So do I. Have two Intels and two AMD. Probably own more Nvidia cards then ATI.
Only in situations like this.
Debatable
Intel has had AMD beat clock for clock since 2006. You think it is still generally speculation?
Whats not real world, unless your looking at synthetic benchmark? Like I have said many times, Intel has had AMD beat clock for clock for 5 years. Then start a thread throwing up a link comparing a three year old architecture to Intel Sandybridge. Like this hasnt been been known for a long time.
If you just now got into computers and just realized Sandybridge was faster then Phenom II. Thought you would give everybody the news. This thread woud make perfect sense (alittle late) but would make sense. But we know this is not your case.
So what is this thread really about?
jonnyp11
New Member
him being a fanboy how makes love to his 2600k every night, i already said this on the last page, and he just loves to kick 'em while they're down ('em being amd) while doing his cpu at the same time.
spynoodle
Active Member
Guys, you might kinda be overreacting a bit. Maybe bigfella is just subscribed to this dude on youtube. I find it to be a pretty interesting comparison, actually. You don't notice much of a difference between CPUs when using a mid-range GPU, but with a GTX 590 the difference really shows. It's food for thought.
chatmasterhhe
New Member
Teehee.
LOL nice picture. That is Intel EXACTLY. I guess a picture does mean a thousand words. haha.
spynoodle
Active Member
It's debatable. There's a pretty noticiable performance improvement in highly threaded programs between the 2500k and 2600k, but the 2500k actually OCs better because it lacks HT (of course you could always disable it on the 2600k, but then you'd be wasting money). I'm sure Intel will release one of those stupid "upgrade" cards for it at some point anyway. :angry:
Okedokey
Well-Known Member
Wow talk about thread hijacking and trolling. If it were me, i probably wouldve had three infractions 
There are plenty of posts about 2600K vs 2500K, and I believe the 2600K is a better wafer, has its benefits and I can afford it, so i went with it.
Exactly, thank you.
Back on topic, I am interested in talking about the architectural differences between AMD's K10 and SB. The 1100T is the flagship product for AMD currently, and arguably the 2500K is the same for Intel in terms of gaming. So this imho is a valid topic.
There are plenty of posts about 2600K vs 2500K, and I believe the 2600K is a better wafer, has its benefits and I can afford it, so i went with it.
Exactly, thank you.
Back on topic, I am interested in talking about the architectural differences between AMD's K10 and SB. The 1100T is the flagship product for AMD currently, and arguably the 2500K is the same for Intel in terms of gaming. So this imho is a valid topic.
Last edited: