666MHz@cas7 vs 800MHz@cas9

[tech savvy]

Str8 to the point. Which would give me better performance, 1333@cas7 or 1600@cas9?

 

[spirit]

1333 CAS-7 most probably, lower timings, but Id still the 1600MHz. There's not a lot of difference.

 

[linkin]

Where you buying from? Newegg?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231445

1600MHz CAS8

 

[tech savvy]

Where you buying from? Newegg?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231445

1600MHz CAS8

Well, the thing is, I already have the ram, it's in my sig. Defualt is 1600MHz@cas9, but I can down it to 1333@cas7, 1600@cas9(Defualt), or 1866@cas10. Out of the three choices here, which would give me better performance, regardless on how much boost I get.

 

[claptonman]

They would pretty much counter-balance each other. Raising the mhz (good) also means raising the cas latency (bad). There would be so very little real world difference, I don't think you should even worry about it.