All have bad reviews??

Because less people buy the unpopular ones so there are less reviews, therefore less chances to get bad reviews, but these mobos are very popular so of course many people will be commenting and also there are a few faulty ones and since so many are being bought the faulty ones have a good chance of being bought.
 
Ya that make sense, I just hate taking chances with hard earned $$. Ya know I guess nothings perfect.
 
Yup true, but you don't learn without mistakes right? Also you should try getting a warranty on most things you buy, so that your $$$ doesn't go to waste
 
Here's how I see it:

If you bought a motherboard, and it works fine, why waste you time writing a review for it?

If you bought a motherboard, and it's DOA or some other error, you'd happily write a angry review.
 
most of those seemed to be DOA bad reviews... if its doa you can get another one... now it could be doa for a number of reasons that dont point to the company. Could of been mishandled in shipping or the person could of shocked it or installed it wrong.
 
I wouldn't go on reviews by random people.

They could have had issues for any one of a billion reasons. Many of which probably have nothing to do with the manufacturer or the product--but rather from user error in installation.

Some people don't even make sense in their comments--One guy said he bought 9 motherboards and they were all DOA so therfore, according to him, noone should trust a noob company like ASUS.

Take comments, and the whole internet for that matter, with a huge grain a salt...
 
Cool. I got NT 3.51, and find it the most stable of the program manager-era windows OSes. Has decent networking and runs freaking firefox 1.5 and loads of other modern programs (its a 32 bit os) -- only problem is it doesnt support IE, and it needs way more ram than 3.11.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top