Hehe, i didn't want you to resurect that thread, i just thought it may help answer your questionOh, I didn't even search the forum first. I forget to do that sometimes. Thanks though.
Its half decent for gaming, but the p-m will still beat it quite convincinglyIs the Turion any good for gaming though? I know that this thread hasn't had any action in a while, but I was just wondering.
Hehe you mean the 12minutes between post5 and post6?Is the Turion any good for gaming though? I know that this thread hasn't had any action in a while, but I was just wondering.
It would be AMD's answer to the PentiumM (not Centrino). Generally i think its fair to say the PentiumM outperforms the Turion64 howeverWouldnt it like the AMD answer to intel's centrino??
The PentiumM/Turion64 is not a budget chip.I mean, they have mobile P4's, mobile Athlon 64's, and they kinda need a budget line for laptops, just like they have Celerons and XP's for desktops.
Yes but we all know from dealing with desktop chips that numbers dont always mean performancein the specs that i saw, the AMD Turion has better specs in all aspects other then Cache, with faster bus speeds, higher bandwidth, ect.
Praetor said:It would be AMD's answer to the PentiumM (not Centrino). Generally i think its fair to say the PentiumM outperforms the Turion64 however
being 64 bit has nothing to do with performance at all. It just means that the cpu is able to address more ramHow can that be?? Turions are 64 bit arent they??