I would say it depends more on what you are doing with it than what you spend on it. If yo absolutely need CUDA driven apps, then AMD is going to be complete crap no matter how many FPS it can pull in games.
Start with a budget and list of apps you use, then use that to pick AMD or Nvidia.
I know there are many Threads (not necessarily on this forum) about who is better AMD or NVIDIA as in specs and pricing but what i want to know more of is how they are run. Where are they based? how do they support the American economy? Where do they manufacture etc. Thanks
.. Although it now looks as though Nvidia are going to be licensing Physx to AMD for the use in the PS4.
Really? That's awesome. Where did you see this?
That's one thing that I do like about both of these companies. They differ in design. So it gives consumers a choice. If NVIDIA is in fact licensing Physx to AMD, it's nice to see that both companies like to play the role of the "battle" but still come together with projects.
Hey Thanks for the useful information,but how it helps American Economy,its still a question?Nvidia's drivers are much more consistent, particularly for multi GPU setups. AMD have always struggled with micro stutter which I have never had from Nvidia cards.
In terms of hardware Nvidia supports CUDA and Physx. If you don't require either of those and are just running a single card there isn't much difference between the two brands. Although it now looks as though Nvidia are going to be licensing Physx to AMD for the use in the PS4.
Hey Thanks for the useful information,but how it helps American Economy,its still a question?![]()