Anybody saw this

StrangleHold

StrangleHold

Moderator
Staff member
CoreModelSpeedTDPBarcelona
(Socket AM2+, Quad Core, 2MB L3 Shared, HT 3.0)
Opteron 1270SE 2.5GHz120W
Opteron 1268SE 2.3GHz120W
Opteron 12662. 1GHz95W
Agena FX
(Socket 1207+, Quad Core, 2MB L3 Shared, HT 3.0)
Athlon 64 FX 2500? 2.5GHz120W
Agena
(Socket AM2+, Quad Core, 2MB L3 Shared, HT 3.0)
Athlon 64 X4 2500 2.5GHz120W
Athlon 64 X4 2300 2.3GHz120W
Athlon 64 X4 2100 2.1GHz95W
Athlon 64 X4 1900 1.9GHz95W
Kuma
(Socket AM2+, Dual Core, 2MB L3 Shared, HT 3.0)
Athlon 64 X2 2900 2.9GHz89W
Athlon 64 X2 2700 2.7GHz89W
Athlon 64 X2 2500 2.5GHz89W
Athlon 64 X2 2300 2.3GHz65W

Athlon 64 X2 2100 2.1GHz65W
Athlon 64 X2 1900 1.9GHz65W
 
Last edited:
seems weird AMD with an L3 cache? is that a mistake? shouldn't it say L2?
also why would they use old number names, that'll make people confused... the people who don't keep much track. well, looks like AMD now has the technology to make dual processor / quad core computers... for a total of 8 cores... that is, without clustering them.

what im wondering is how fast is HT this time? and why would they make processors in increments of 100mhz instead of two? seems like a waste of money to me really. did they switch to 65nm yet?
 
Yea its L3, there all 65mn and the numbering, they droped the PR rating. So a 2.4ghz Athlon 64 will be called a Athlon 64 2400. There all 200mhz increments!
 
Last edited:
I notice the clock speeds on the dual cores are decently higher than Intel's... anyone know how they match up?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top