no idea.. Im using the modern one,.. i hate the looks of that grey bar![]()
I can't stand the look of the Sesame Street interface, so I have always used Classic. I tried the XP UI, and my machine bogged down really badly, more than likely because I have my graphics shared with my RAM.
Tom
If your in the US ill mail you a ATI Rage card, i have 6 of them![]()
I can't stand the look of the Sesame Street interface, so I have always used Classic. Tom
I haven't figured out if I really "need" more than integrated graphics. I'm not really a gamer; most of the time I do 2D work (surfing, forums, apps like Nero, etc); the toughest thing I do graphically is watch DVDs and edit images. But thanks for that most generous offer!!
Tom
If your in the US ill mail you a ATI Rage card, i have 6 of them![]()
One of the few goals of vista was to implement an OS install on average of 15 minutes, and boot times on average of 20 seconds or less.
Not quite sure if they are going to meet those goals
This isn't just OS-dependent! I had my 80GB WD hard drive as Master and XP booted up in like 40 seconds. I switched to have my 20GB Maxtor as Master and now my bootup time is 55-60 seconds. But 20 seconds?? Can a disc-based HD really do this, or are they talking about one of those RAM-based HDs?
Tom