CPU & Demographics

Status
Not open for further replies.
RBCP

RBCP

New Member
This is a forum of certain computer users but there are certain variables that make us different. I should point out that the 386 sx & dx and the 486 are still alive and kicking and playing the latest games. That's only like 33 and 66mhz. Among other computers. I bring this up because it is useful information. I also own a Celeron 1.6 Ghz Dual Core. These computers play all the latest games and have no issues. As a matter of fact, well I could go on but won't. Just wanted to bring up the fact that people still use the old Commadore 64 and Vic128, amiga and so forth. Apple computers is doing amazingly well with it's CPU. Overclocking, now were talking. --Crash Override
 
I should point out that the 386 sx & dx and the 486 are still alive and kicking and playing the latest games.
Click to expand...
No they aren't. You aren't going to play Fallout 4, GTA V, etc. on a 386 or 486. None of the components can even run hardware or software required to play those games.

I bring this up because it is useful information.
Click to expand...
Not really.

I also own a Celeron 1.6 Ghz Dual Core. These computers play all the latest games and have no issues.
Click to expand...
The Celeron 1.6 is an old and very low powered process, it could play the latest games but even with a 980Ti video card it's not going to play them "without any issues"

Just wanted to bring up the fact that people still use the old Commadore 64 and Vic128, amiga and so forth.
Click to expand...
Maybe when they want to be reminded of what computers where like 20 years ago, but no one uses those as their primary device.

Apple computers is doing amazingly well with it's CPU. Overclocking, now were talking.
Click to expand...
Apple uses the same processors that many Linux and Windows users use.
 
I can't tell if this is a troll post or genuine :D But yeah, Geoff is right.
My 2600K @ 4.4GHz can barely run GTA IV on high, even after I upgraded from HD 6950 2GB to GTX 780 3GB.
 
Last edited:
Geoff said:
Apple uses the same processors that many Linux and Windows users use.
Click to expand...

This, really. For the OP's info, Apple migrated to x86 based processors a while ago, which really allowed the whole 'bootcamp' functionality to exist as it does. Currently they use the same hardware as you can find in other systems.

Jiniix said:
I can't tell if this is a troll post or genuine :D But yeah, Geoff is right.
My 2600K @ 4.4GHz can barely run GTA IV on high, even after I upgraded from HD 6950 2GB to GTX 780 3GB.
Click to expand...

GTA IV has been a turd since it launched. Runs pretty similarly now as it did on a Phenom II X3 720 and a 3870 for me :P
 
Who still uses a Commodore 64 as their main machine? There are still people using older machines, yes, that's absolutely true. But these old machines that they are using are at least 20 years newer than the Commodore, probably getting on for 25 years newer!

Those who collect old computers like Commodores and Spectrums do it for the sake of nostalgia or because it's a hobby and they're interested - not because they want to use them as main machines. My Dad collected a few older computers years ago. They're up in the attic in their boxes whilst an i7 3770 machine is what he uses!
 
VSYNC? Well59.34hz+etc. It's a hardware opponent system for 60 fps via the main graphic array for ALL computers. YUP, at least 60 fps on ANY game with ULTRA HiGH settingS.
 
Are you okay, mate? It's been a month, and you come back babbling about VSYNC?!
Btw, I just realized he may be quoting an organisation that helps people who gets swatted or other forms of online abuse.. which only makes me so much more confused.
 
RBCP said:
VSYNC? Well59.34hz+etc. It's a hardware opponent system for 60 fps via the main graphic array for ALL computers. YUP, at least 60 fps on ANY game with ULTRA HiGH settingS.
Click to expand...

Vsync doesn't increase FPS (if anything it drastically increases input lag). It simply tries to match with the monitor refresh. If your GPU can't render enough frames up to the refresh/Vsync value then you'll still show FPS drops.
 
RBCP said:
VSYNC? Well59.34hz+etc. It's a hardware opponent system for 60 fps via the main graphic array for ALL computers. YUP, at least 60 fps on ANY game with ULTRA HiGH settingS.
Click to expand...
VSYNC doesn't automatically give your games 60FPS (if you have a 60Hz monitor), if your system is not capable of outputting a consistent 60FPS+ then you will still see frame rates in the 20's, 30's, etc. All it does is as beers said, it caps the maximum frame rate to minimize tearing.
 
I didn't say you achieve this by using V-Sync. Computers just operate like this traditionally. Also, Win10 is coming out. Will be interested in my (your) screenshots. Don't argue with me.
 
RBCP said:
I didn't say you achieve this by using V-Sync. Computers just operate like this traditionally. Also, Win10 is coming out. Will be interested in my (your) screenshots. Don't argue with me.
Click to expand...

You didn't? In that case I must admit to being thoroughly confused. Can you re-explain this to me then?

RBCP said:
VSYNC? Well59.34hz+etc. It's a hardware opponent system for 60 fps via the main graphic array for ALL computers. YUP, at least 60 fps on ANY game with ULTRA HiGH settingS.
Click to expand...

It certainly reads like you say I can turn on vsync and instantly get 60fps in any game at any time.
 
Okay, it goes like this...this is earth. There are actually TEN planets (including Luna). Atari, Colleco, the 286. It's vast. It is still used to today. When using a computer, it is NORMALLY set to run any game. Why do you think that everyone is us and using Cores? EXPLAIN THIS TO ME. You can't. Just Xbox and Playstation and Nintendo, not even close. HAVEN'T YOU EVER BEEN TO A STORE?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top