hello45044
New Member
What is a good fan/heatsink for an Intel Pentium 4 2.40GHz socket 478 CPU? The stock fan and heatsink don't seem to be doing good enough.
Where is that number coming from? 2mm thick piece of copper will produce the same results (ie same thermal resistance)... meaning I think that number is a bit highI suspect the thermal transfer rate to be in the ballpark of 200,000W/m²·°C -- much like AC
200,000W/m²·ºC is the measure of thermal conductance per 0.001" (0.000254 mm) layer it's thermal resistance is [given as] 0.007ºC-in²/W (again for 0.001") for AC. Hehe if you think that's high, AS5 is rated at 350,000W/m²·ºCWhere is that number coming from? 2mm thick piece of copper will produce the same results (ie same thermal resistance)... meaning I think that number is a bit high
That's gotta be one of the stupidest rating systems I've heard. Basically just making things more complicated than they should be. Is plain old thermal conductivity (k [W/m-K] ) too hard to present? And on top of that, mixing metric and English units (okay, it's not as bad as the EER of air conditioners).200,000W/m²·ºC is the measure of thermal conductance per 0.001" (0.000254 mm) layer it's thermal resistance is [given as] 0.007ºC-in²/W (again for 0.001") for AC. Hehe if you think that's high, AS5 is rated at 350,000W/m²·ºC
How about Unreal Tournament 2004's rating of "Rating Pending"?That's gotta be one of the stupidest rating systems I've heard
Bah then they'd have to explain what kelvins were and why their numbers are different from someone who wasnt using kelvins ... and thus we have the classic case of consumer saying "why dont they use 'normal' numbers like everyone else" (reminiscient of AMD/Intel)Is plain old thermal conductivity (k [W/m^2] ) too hard to present?
Is there anything cheaper than the Thermaltake POLO 735 Extreme that will work good?
.chill, we dont live here; nor do we exist to answer your questions right away.
yes.