Anybody got a good idea of a (quality) power supply?
Is your computer so hot as to toast bread? If not, it does not need anywhere near 1000 watts. But the naive actually (foolishly) believe more watts is better quality.
A computer typically consumes between 100 and 200 watts. But power supply manufacturers need not meet design or safety standards. That responsibility is 100% on the computer assembler - ie you. So they short the supply of essential functions, increase its wattage, and market to people who have no idea what a supply must do.
For example, can a power supply damage other computer parts? Absolutely not if required functions exist. Functions that existed long before PCs even existed. However many computer assemblers have no idea what a PSU must do. Then buy big watt supplies that are missing essential functions. Then suffer motherboard damage directly traceable to their technical ignorance.
Now, your system is intermittent. Why? Only honest answer starts with numbers that you take from six wires inside the machine. Taken without even disconnecting any parts. One minute of labor. Without those numbers, then every reply is only wild speculation. Notice how many said "it could be", "it might be", or "try to ...".
How do they dump inferior supplies in a robust market of computer assemblers? No specifications. Then the fewer who actually know how hardware works can only remain silent. If that supply does not come with a full sheet of numeric specs, then suspect the worst. Inferior supply that the informed cannot expose - due to no specs. Also ignore recommendation without numeric specifications. Junk science is alive and well where people make recommendations devoid of numbers.
To keep technical support lines clear, we tell computer assemblers that they need double the actual watts. Explains why so many computer assemblers buy supplies that are double what a computer needs - ie buy 500 watts.