jp198780 New Member Dec 24, 2006 #1 is there really a difference wit runnin a game on Low settings, and runnin a game on Highest settings? i play GTA:SA on my 240 on Lowest settings (all i can play cause my computer isnt the best ) and the graphics still look great...
is there really a difference wit runnin a game on Low settings, and runnin a game on Highest settings? i play GTA:SA on my 240 on Lowest settings (all i can play cause my computer isnt the best ) and the graphics still look great...
Yasu New Member Dec 24, 2006 #2 Yes, there's a difference and it's usually huge...I can run BF2142 on low settings and maintain 50FPS easy but when I raise everything to high I max out at 30FPS...it also depends if I'm playing conquest or titan...
Yes, there's a difference and it's usually huge...I can run BF2142 on low settings and maintain 50FPS easy but when I raise everything to high I max out at 30FPS...it also depends if I'm playing conquest or titan...
Geoff VIP Member Dec 24, 2006 #3 The major difference is quality. There is a significant difference between low and highest on all games.
The major difference is quality. There is a significant difference between low and highest on all games.
M meanman Active Member Dec 24, 2006 #4 some games more than others oblivian on low settings you wont see places in the distance that cane be a pain
some games more than others oblivian on low settings you wont see places in the distance that cane be a pain
) and the graphics still look great...
