Information on Hard Disk Drives and Failures

2048Megabytes

Active Member
I found the following information interesting. If you want to read the full article you can go to the link at the bottom of the post.

The most notorious cause of hard-disk failure is a head crash, where the internal read-and-write head of the device touches a platter, or a magnetic data-storage surface. A head crash usually incurs severe data loss, and data recovery attempts may cause further damage if not done by a specialist with proper equipment. Hard-drive platters are coated with an extremely thin layer of non-electrostatic lubricant, so that the read-and-write head will simply glance off the surface of the platter should a collision occur. However, this head hovers mere nanometers from the platter's surface which makes a collision an acknowledged risk. Another cause of failure is a faulty air filter. The air filters on today's hard drives equalize the atmospheric pressure and moisture between the hard-drive enclosure and its outside environment. If the filter fails to capture a dust particle, the particle can land on the platter, causing a head crash if the head happens to sweep over it. After a hard-drive crash, each particle from the damaged platter and head media can cause a bad sector. These, in addition to platter damage, will quickly render a hard drive useless. A hard drive also includes controller electronics, which occasionally fail. In such cases, it may be possible to recover all data.

Since hard drives are mechanical devices, they will all eventually fail. While some may not fail prematurely, many hard drives simply fail because of worn out parts. Many hard-drive manufacturers include a Mean Time Between Failures figure on product packaging or in promotional literature. These are calculated by constantly running samples of the drive for a short amount of time, analyzing the resultant wear and tear upon the physical components of the drive, and extrapolating to provide a reasonable estimate of its lifespan. Since this fails to account for phenomena such as the aforementioned head crash, external trauma (dropping or collision), power surges, and so forth, the Mean Time Between Failures number is not generally regarded as an accurate estimate of a drive's lifespan. Hard-drive failures tend to follow the concept of the bathtub curve. Hard drives typically fail within a short time if there is a defect present from manufacturing. If a hard drive proves reliable for a period of a few months after installation, the hard drive has a significantly greater chance of remaining reliable. Therefore, even if a hard drive is subjected to several years of heavy daily use, it may not show any notable signs of wear unless closely inspected. On the other hand, a hard drive can fail at any time in many different situations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_disk_failure
 
I've heard this analogy regarding the head flying over the disk surface: Imagine a jumbo jet flying 6 inches off the ground at 1,000mph.

It's not a question of IF an HDD will fail, but WHEN.
 
Hard drives still have the most options available and are the most reliable out of all secondary storage devices for computers.

I think they will still be around in 10 years. Solid State Drives will replace them eventually as the technology gets better.
 
I've heard this analogy regarding the head flying over the disk surface: Imagine a jumbo jet flying 6 inches off the ground at 1,000mph.

It's not a question of IF an HDD will fail, but WHEN.
Youch, I wouldn't want to be in that jet. :)

The bathtub curve thing is reassuring, though. It makes me have high hopes for my Spinpoint.
 
Solid State Drives have the potential to last longer than Hard Disk Drives because they do not have moving parts. I have a Western Digital Hard Disk Drive that I have been using since around the year 2002. But I also shut my computer off at night which saves wear and tear on hard drives.
 
Back
Top