intels new cpu

[super_xero]

intel are planing to release a procesor with 65nm process using the same desighns from the pentium m and pentium 6** series do you think it could potentially be as good as say amd fx series

 

[34erd]

There 65 nm M's and P4 are different cores, the M is based on the Yonah core, the P4 on the Cedar Mill, which is basicly a shrunk prescott. I think the new M's are going to be killers if we can get some good mobos with them especialy if overclocked, because of the 65 nm procces.

 

[spamdos]

isnt the p4 3.7EE already as good as the fx processor

 

[Ku-sama]

There 65 nm M's and P4 are different cores, the M is based on the Yonah core, the P4 on the Cedar Mill, which is basicly a shrunk prescott. I think the new M's are going to be killers if we can get some good mobos with them especialy if overclocked, because of the 65 nm procces.

65nanometers? pretty small compared to the 90nm and the 120nm A64s, although i dont think they will be stable overclockers unless they use a diffrent chip material as silicon only resists electricity so good at that thin

isnt the p4 3.7EE already as good as the fx processor

maybe the FX-51/53, but not the FX-55/57

 

[super_xero]

yer its gona run quite cool compared to there counterparts

 

[apj101]

65nanometers? pretty small compared to the 90nm and the 120nm A64s, although i dont think they will be stable overclockers unless they use a diffrent chip material as silicon only resists electricity so good at that thin

are you saying that 120nm cores oc'd better than 90nms
Nothing like non-sensical jargon to make a point

using the same desighns from the pentium m and pentium 6**

Stop saying that
I made some comments on this today
http://www.computerforum.com/showpost.php?p=167001&postcount=36

isnt the p4 3.7EE already as good as the fx processor

at what

do you think it could potentially be as good as say amd fx series

at what

maybe the FX-51/53, but not the FX-55/57

any reason for that

 

[maroon1]

There 65 nm M's and P4 are different cores, the M is based on the Yonah core, the P4 on the Cedar Mill, which is basicly a shrunk prescott. I think the new M's are going to be killers if we can get some good mobos with them especialy if overclocked, because of the 65 nm procces.

i can't believe this u r just 12 and u know about these ^ things.

 

[apj101]

i can't believe this u r just 12 and u know about these ^ things.

i knew about these things when i was 12, and most of what he said is right

 

[super_xero]

thats what i heard

 

[Ku-sama]

are you saying that 120nm cores oc'd better than 90nms
Nothing like non-sensical jargon to make a point

i checked, its 130nm, not 120, my mistake, and im just saying, if you put enough voltage through it, it might jump the gap, not that the 130nm overclocks better

also the FX-51 processor prolly would get beat by the new intel processor because the FX-51 is a good processor, just a little dated

 

[Praetor]

There 65 nm M's and P4 are different cores, the M is based on the Yonah core, the P4 on the Cedar Mill, which is basicly a shrunk prescott. I think the new M's are going to be killers if we can get some good mobos with them especialy if overclocked, because of the 65 nm procces.

Well the Yonah is based on the 'M' ... the problem right now with the 'M's' are the poo FP performance which hopefullt gets fixed when Yonah launches

int the p4 3.7EE already as good as the fx processor

For what task?

i checked, its 130nm, not 120, my mistake, and im just saying, if you put enough voltage through it, it might jump the gap, not that the 130nm overclocks better

Yes but voltage is what kills chips (ignoring people that kill chips via heat ... i mean strictly with the pros here, its voltage)