Interesting facts about computerforum.com

691175002

New Member
All of this was true when I wrote this message (but won't be true once I post it)

In total there are 4 380 users.
In total there are[font=&quot] 64 917 posts.

That means on avrage that each person has posted 14.8 messages.
25 people on the forum have posted
[/font][font=&quot]31233 messages.
That means that 0.005 people account for 48% of all posts!
When you take out the top 25 people each user has on avrage posted 7 messsages.


691175002 out...
[/font]
 
691175002 said:
All of this was true when I wrote this message (but won't be true once I post it)

In total there are 4 380 users.
In total there are[font=&quot] 64 917 posts.

That means on avrage that each person has posted 14.8 messages.
25 people on the forum have posted
[/font][font=&quot]31233 messages.
That means that 0.005 people account for 48% of all posts!
When you take out the top 25 people each user has on avrage posted 7 messsages.


691175002 out...
[/font]
The bottom of the page would have said 5,830 users not 4 380 users, where did you get the 4380 users from?
 
691175002 said:
[font=&quot]
That means on avrage that each person has posted 14.8 messages.
[/font]
Not really, Prae has 10500, if you take that out, and use the right number of users, it would be a lot lower, like 10ish
 
Computerforum.com might have a lot of accounts/ user but only not a lot post regularly i.e. They sign up > ask for solution to a problem > get solution then p*ss off :mad: . I admire the people who do post regularly. Would it be unfair to delete the accounts that have been inactive for more than a year or so?
 
whys it a bad thing to find the answer to your problem and leave? isnt that what this forum is for.
 
.....

OS Dragon said:
Would it be unfair to delete the accounts that have been inactive for more than a year or so?

Why?

smadge said:
whys it a bad thing to find the answer to your problem and leave? isnt that what this forum is for.

Exactly, ist not a bad thing. Hopefully their questions are answered thoroughly enough so that they dont have to come back ;)
 
ian said:
The bottom of the page would have said 5,830 users not 4 380 users, where did you get the 4380 users from?

I clicked on "members list" then counted how many people there were on a page. Then I multiplied that by the number of pages in total (144 I think).

heinzbitte said:
If everyone left after their questions were answered, who would do the answering?
The people on the leaderboard who have way too much time on their hands (like me!:)).
 
OS Dragon said:
Would it be unfair to delete the accounts that have been inactive for more than a year or so?
no it wouldnt be unfair but whats the purpose, as far as i know they dont take space or harm anything.
 
Well just for everyones information, in the future, there will be some small prizes, mostly what I can get companies to donate, and I will donate some myself, and I really do mean small stuff. Anyhow there will be five forums in this network all together, and a number will be drawn at random between 1 and 500 which will correspond to a person on one of the forums who is on the leaderboard. In other words, only people on the leaderboard will be eligible to win. I would like to see being on the leaderboard to hold some priviledges.
 
.... hopefully everyone will still keep in mind the saying: "Quality over quantity" when it comes to posting...
 
SFR said:
hopefully everyone will still keep in mind the saying: "Quality over quantity" when it comes to posting
Isn't it really annoying when some people post messages with less that 5 words. Its like they're trying to achieve something ;) (Rank) the easy way instead of thinking about the quality.
 
Last edited:
i disagree. because sometimes what you trying to say can be best summed up in less than 5 words

If everyone left after their questions were answered, who would do the answering?

the people who stay :D
ps i havent gotten ahang of the qoute tool
 
Last edited:
Back
Top