Is dx10 worth it?

Willis240

New Member
I'm curently running XP SP2 and i dont want to change to vista. the only reason i would is to be able to run the new next-gen dx10 games. how serious are the driver issues or any other compatibility problems? Also, will the XP SP3 include dx10 so i don't need to get vista? And will the next SP for vista help any of the current problems significantly? What should i do? I don't think dual booting would be a possibility due to budget, unless someone can show me a cheaper way...:(
 
Theres still no need to upgrade to Vista solely to play DX10 games, as the ones that are out now hardly show any improvement. I would wait and see if Microsoft adds DX10 to XP, although I highly doubt it.
 
[-0MEGA-];801138 said:
I would wait and see if Microsoft adds DX10 to XP, although I highly doubt it.

they wont do that because then they would loose sales on vista :)

nobody would bother buying it if they could get dx10 on xp.
 
they wont do that because then they would loose sales on vista :)

nobody would bother buying it if they could get dx10 on xp.
If you really think about it, only a small percentage of people actually buy Vista for DX10. People mainly have it because it comes standard on PC's.
 
Ah, but they can. Alky's project, google it! They're not just working on XP, Linux and OSX too.

haha thats brilliant :D

i wouldnt be suprised if microsoft tried to stop that happening because they want people to buy vista in the future for dx10...thats one of vistas main selling points imo.

[-0MEGA-];801354 said:
If you really think about it, only a small percentage of people actually buy Vista for DX10. People mainly have it because it comes standard on PC's.

well yeah true :)
 
I just found my old working copy of XP (unused serial) and now i can dual boot because i'll only have to buy one OS. Is dual booting inconvenient? And will all the new games be able to play on dx9 and on dx10? I would also like a quick description on dual booting if thats possible...
 
duel boot is when you turn your pc on it will go to a screen giving you the option to pick which os you want to boot to.and for the time being all games including crysis are compatable with dx9 and dx10.
 
Vista's compatibility issues are, for the most part, resolved.

Probably the most notable game that utilizes DX10 graphics (other than the recently released Crysis) is Bioshock.

The most notable part about DX10 is the new particle effect that makes airborne particles look and react to the environment more realistic. This is noticeable with dust clouds and rays of light that pass through a dusty environment.

Another notable feature is the water effects and how water reacts to it's environment. Rather than seeing pre-made animations, the water will realistically splash and ripple accordingly to it's cause. This, however, can be undermined when a game already has realistic looking water effects.

Supposedly, DX10 is suppose to make shadows look more realistic but, otherwise, it takes existing shadows and dithers(wording?) the edges. Many games are already able to do this under DX9 but DX10 may take up less resources doing this.

DX10, supposedly, is suppose to take up less resources rendering graphics than it would with the same graphics under DX9 but this is probably highly debatable.

The last thing that can be notable is the new shader capabilities, making textures look and respond to the environment more realistic. Probably the most notable textures would be the reflective metallic or fur. This too can be undermined if the game was already made with realistic looking textures under DX9.

The best thing to do is look up DX9 vs DX10 shaders and graphics and judge for yourself whether it's worth it. You need to be careful though because some screenshots of Bioshock, under it's DX9 shaders option, will use a hybrid of DX9 and 10 shaders and graphics.
 
Back
Top