diduknowthat
formerly liuliuboy
How do AMD and Intel think of all these names for cores? Venice, Winchester (hey it's my town's name
), newcastle, clawhammer, northwood??? All so random!

lolSo are this forum members' names
better then a numeric systemHow do AMD and Intel think of all these names for cores? Venice, Winchester (hey it's my town's name ), newcastle, clawhammer, northwood??? All so random!
indeed, im still getting to grips with intels bloody confusing number system. i dont understand why they had to change it, everyone knew what an Inte Pentium 4 3.0Ghz with HT technology was, now its all Intel 530, 650... WTFbetter then a numeric system
Me and cromewell had this discussion earlier, intels systems is not too bad when you sit and think about it read our postdragon2309 said:indeed, im still getting to grips with intels bloody confusing number system. i dont understand why they had to change it, everyone knew what an Inte Pentium 4 3.0Ghz with HT technology was, now its all Intel 530, 650... WTF
Me and cromewell had this discussion earlier, intels systems is not too bad when you sit and think about it read our post
http://computerforum.com/showthread.php?t=17940
yaMI pleHouY said:I think they should change things up a bit. "Beef stick" "Raging Squirrel"
Those would be good core names.
Well if you deal with CPUID codes then you dont have to bother with codenames and all that sillyniessBloody hell that was confusing. Has anyone made a definitive table with every single numerical codename and what it actually means in terms of core spped bus speed cache size etc, cause that would be so much easier to look at.