andy_mitch92
New Member
What is better? My friend and I are having a bit of an argument about this, I think its better to have the pure clock speed of the fsb because it means that you can get more info in and out of the cpu per cycle, an my friend ( who in his defense doesn't have an overclockable computer) thinks that the higher multiplier is better because you can overclock them more with a lower fsb. Which to me and my logic is that you can have a cpu at say 3 ghz with a multiplier of 15 and only have the fsb at 800 mhz, and another cpu at 3 ghz with a multiplier of 9 and a higher fsb ( i dont know how to do the math on figuring fsb) but be able to have better performance because of data transfer rates.
Who is correct, or is it just really what you like better?
Who is correct, or is it just really what you like better?